Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 8 submissions in the queue.
posted by Fnord666 on Wednesday September 12 2018, @04:41AM   Printer-friendly
from the they-can't-hear-you dept.

PC World has an article on why USB-C has not been a viable alternative for the 3.5mm audio jack. Problems with USB-C include variable handling of digital to audio conversion, incompatible SOCs inside the cable, and non-standard analog-passthrough. In short, the cables which contain computers themselves are not standardized in behavior and the author's conclusion is that mobile devices must have 3.5mm jacks until the USB-C cable technology gets sorted out enough that they become usable.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 13 2018, @04:05PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 13 2018, @04:05PM (#734301)

    no cord = battery = trouble
    no cord = wireless = protocols and interference = trouble
    3,5 jack cord = it works and if it doesn't I can fix it.

    I should better say it USED TO work, because in the 80s and 90s jacks and RCA were not as problematic as what they sell today. Mystery of progress.

    Also I see no reason why a thirty yearish sony v300 (bought before the boycott caused by the cd rootkits still enforced in this household to this day) should be replaced.