Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by Fnord666 on Wednesday September 12 2018, @04:41AM   Printer-friendly
from the they-can't-hear-you dept.

PC World has an article on why USB-C has not been a viable alternative for the 3.5mm audio jack. Problems with USB-C include variable handling of digital to audio conversion, incompatible SOCs inside the cable, and non-standard analog-passthrough. In short, the cables which contain computers themselves are not standardized in behavior and the author's conclusion is that mobile devices must have 3.5mm jacks until the USB-C cable technology gets sorted out enough that they become usable.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 13 2018, @04:05PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 13 2018, @04:05PM (#734301)

    no cord = battery = trouble
    no cord = wireless = protocols and interference = trouble
    3,5 jack cord = it works and if it doesn't I can fix it.

    I should better say it USED TO work, because in the 80s and 90s jacks and RCA were not as problematic as what they sell today. Mystery of progress.

    Also I see no reason why a thirty yearish sony v300 (bought before the boycott caused by the cd rootkits still enforced in this household to this day) should be replaced.