Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by mrpg on Friday September 28 2018, @05:11AM   Printer-friendly
from the nature-will-find-a-way dept.

Controlling mosquitos with a gene drive that makes females infertile:

We've known for a long time that we can limit malaria infections by controlling the mosquitos that transmit them. But that knowledge hasn't translated into control efforts that have always been completely successful. Many of the approaches we've used to control mosquitos have caused environmental problems, and mosquito populations are large enough that they have evolved resistance to many of our pesticides.

That made the development of what are called "gene drive" constructs exciting (if a bit scary). They have the potential to rapidly spread genes throughout a population—including a mosquito population. But the prospect of a modern genetic control of mosquito populations has run up against the very old problem of evolution, as the gene drives often stall due to genetic changes that allow mosquito populations to escape their impact.

Now, a team has figured out a way that might avoid this problem: use gene drive to target a gene that's fundamental to how mosquitos develop as male or female. In doing so, it makes the females sterile and, at least in the lab, causes mosquito populations to collapse.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Phoenix666 on Friday September 28 2018, @09:55AM (3 children)

    by Phoenix666 (552) on Friday September 28 2018, @09:55AM (#741256) Journal

    the best thing would be to modify them so they don't bite humans anymore. they can bite other animals all they like.

    --
    Washington DC delenda est.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2, Interesting) by kiffer on Friday September 28 2018, @11:11AM (1 child)

    by kiffer (3153) on Friday September 28 2018, @11:11AM (#741273)

    This was my understanding of the general goal.
    Rather than use a chemical to basically kill all the insects in an area you only target the ones that bite people.
    You don't waste time and money to remove non-problem insects.
    You wouldn't even have to remove all human biting mosquitoes,
    only the species that carry malaria... if that's an option.

    Then you hope that other types take up their niches feeding birds, fertilizing plants... what ever.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 28 2018, @11:22PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 28 2018, @11:22PM (#741598)

      Could they modify that chemical so that we could target Muslims who are jihadis? Then we could spray all the Muslims, the jihadis would die and the good ones would get to live. More humane than our current methods of Muslim control.

  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Immerman on Friday September 28 2018, @02:40PM

    by Immerman (3985) on Friday September 28 2018, @02:40PM (#741342)

    There's *lots* of species of mosquitoes. As I recall only one or two of them target humans, with the dominant people-biter being an invasive organism that has spread across the globe thanks to modern transportation systems. If we could successfully eliminate just that species (as a gene drive is intended to do) we'd actually be restoring ecological niches to the native, non-people-biting mosquitoes and other nectar-feeders. I see absolutely no reasoin to object to the *goal*.

    The *strategy* they're considering on the other hand...

    All those other species of mosquito are also so many different possibilities for successful cross-breeding, allowing the gene drive to spread into other species. Interspecies breeding is only *mostly* unviable, the genetic boundaries between species are often not quite as uncrossable as they teach in high school biology. There's no telling where they might stop. And gene drives can't be reliably eliminated once released, except by the extinction of the species. At best they could be replaced with another "benign" gene drive - and then you have permanently bestowed the "infected" species with cutting-edge microbial gene-editing technology. And evolution does so love to put useful genes to work...