Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 19 submissions in the queue.
posted by mrpg on Wednesday October 17 2018, @03:11AM   Printer-friendly
from the don't-care-is-not-america[sarcasm] dept.

Submitted via IRC for Bytram

Two degrees decimated Puerto Rico's insect populations

While temperatures in the tropical forests of northeastern Puerto Rico have climbed two degrees Celsius since the mid-1970s, the biomass of arthropods—invertebrate animals such as insects, millipedes, and sowbugs—has declined by as much as 60-fold, according to new findings published today in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

The finding supports the recent United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change warnings of severe environmental threats given a 2.0 degree Celsius elevation in global temperature. Like some other tropical locations, the study area in the Luquillo rainforest has already reached or exceeded a 2.0 degree Celsius rise in average temperature, and the study finds that the consequences are potentially catastrophic.

"Our results suggest that the effects of climate warming in tropical forests may be even greater than anticipated" said Brad Lister lead author of the study and a faculty member in the Department of Biological Sciences at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. "The insect populations in the Luquillo forest are crashing, and once that begins the animals that eat the insects have insufficient food, which results in decreased reproduction and survivorship and consequent declines in abundance."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday October 17 2018, @02:15PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday October 17 2018, @02:15PM (#749963)

    They're comparing the same times of the year.

    Yes, I know. This has nothing to do with the fact the 1970s study started at "dawn" and ran for 12 hours while the 2010s study started at an unknown time at least 12 hours before "dusk". Nor does it address the different possible meanings of dawn/dusk which could mean including (or not) up to an hour of extra darkness.

    Given the huge decline in ground arthropods, I'd suggest looking at ground-based invasive species like the "red imported fire ant" [wikipedia.org] which was introduced to Puerto Rico by 1982 and now is widespread throughout the island and may by itself explain the decline in insect populations observed.

    Could be that. It could be a lot of things, which is why the mere presence of a correlation is not interesting.