Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 19 submissions in the queue.
posted by martyb on Thursday October 18 2018, @08:35AM   Printer-friendly
from the good-luck-mio-chan dept.

Update: Launch was successful.

The BepiColombo mission to Mercury is set for launch on Saturday, October 20. The spacecraft consists of two satellites which will eventually detach and settle into two separate orbits around Mercury:

BepiColombo is a joint mission of the European Space Agency (ESA) and the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) to the planet Mercury. The mission comprises two satellites to be launched together: the Mercury Planetary Orbiter (MPO) and Mio (Mercury Magnetospheric Orbiter, MMO). The mission will perform a comprehensive study of Mercury, including its magnetic field, magnetosphere, interior structure and surface. It is scheduled to launch in October 2018, with an arrival at Mercury planned for December 2025, after a flyby of Earth, two flybys of Venus, and six flybys of Mercury. The mission was approved in November 2009, after years in proposal and planning as part of the European Space Agency's Horizon 2000+ program; it will be the last mission of the program to be launched.

[...] The main objectives of the mission are:

  • Study the origin and evolution of a planet close to its parent star
  • Study Mercury as a planet—its form, interior, structure, geology, composition and craters
  • Investigate Mercury's exosphere, composition and dynamics, including generation and escape
  • Study Mercury's magnetised envelope (magnetosphere) - structure and dynamics
  • Investigate the origin of Mercury's magnetic field
  • Verify Einstein's theory of general relativity by measuring the parameters gamma and beta of the parameterized post-Newtonian formalism with high accuracy.

The first event will be an Earth flyby on April 6, 2020, followed by a Venus flyby on October 12, 2020. The spacecraft's first Mercury flyby will be on October 2, 2021.

ESA and JAXA pages.

Previously: ESA Shows off BepiColombo Mercury Orbiters Ahead of 2018 Launch


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Informative) by takyon on Thursday October 18 2018, @02:39PM (3 children)

    by takyon (881) <{takyon} {at} {soylentnews.org}> on Thursday October 18 2018, @02:39PM (#750463) Journal

    Uranus and Neptune Are Potential Targets for 2030s Missions [soylentnews.org]

    NASA Wants to Probe Deeper Into Uranus Than Ever Before [soylentnews.org]

    They are more expensive to reach, and missions to them take much longer.

    Saturn's Enceladus and Titan are high-priority moons. Jupiter's Europa is a high-priority moon (Ganymede and Callisto are important but Europa is on another tier of importance, with Congress mandating a mission there). Jupiter is important to study because of its big gravitational impact on the solar system.

    Not only is Jupiter closer, we can send solar-powered missions there now [wikipedia.org].

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exploration_of_Neptune [wikipedia.org]

    Direct flyby missions to Neptune are only preferable in window gaps with a 12-year interval, due to the complexity of planetary positions. There is currently a window open for launching a Neptune mission from 2014 to 2019, with the next opportunity occurring from 2031. These constraints are based on current rocket technology which relies on gravity assists from Jupiter and Saturn. With the new Space Launch System (SLS) technology in development at Boeing, deep space missions with heavier payloads could potentially be propelled at much greater speeds (200 AU in 15 years) and missions to the outer planets could be launched independently of gravity assistance.

    Obviously that applies to BFR, maybe moreso since it can do in-orbit refueling (possibly more than once if you use a lot of BFRs).

    --
    [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Informative=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 2) by bzipitidoo on Thursday October 18 2018, @04:47PM (2 children)

    by bzipitidoo (4388) on Thursday October 18 2018, @04:47PM (#750522) Journal

    I have some difficulty crediting that the mere distance to Uranus and Neptune are that big a problem. They're further, but not that much further than Saturn.

    But perhaps I underestimate the problems of traversing that relatively modest bit of extra distance? Maybe it's that the much smaller mass of ice giants as compared to the gas giants makes it correspondingly harder to do an orbital insertion? The technique of swinging past Mercury several times is relatively quick because Mercury's orbit is so fast, takes only a few years. To do the same way out at Uranus would take decades.

    Planet 9 now, yes, that's far enough away that different techniques will be needed.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday October 18 2018, @06:03PM (1 child)

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday October 18 2018, @06:03PM (#750570)

      They're further, but not that much further than Saturn.

      What are you talking about? Saturn's orbit is about 9 AU, Uranus is about 19, and Neptune is 30! That's two and three times the distance of Saturn, respectively! And it took over six and a half years to get Cassini to Saturn!

      SPACE IS BIG!