Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Friday November 09 2018, @01:52PM   Printer-friendly
from the only-if-Betteridge-is-not-on-it dept.

How predictable is evolution? The answer has long been debated by biologists grappling with the extent to which history affects the repeatability of evolution.

A review published in the Nov. 9 issue of Science explores the complexity of evolution's predictability in extraordinary detail. In it, researchers at Kenyon College, Michigan State University and Washington University in St. Louis closely examine evidence from a number of empirical studies of evolutionary repeatability and contingency in an effort to fully interrogate ideas about contingency's role in evolution.

The question of evolution's predictability was notably raised by the late paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould, who advocated the view that evolution is contingent and unrepeatable in his 1989 book Wonderful Life. "Replay the tape a million times ... and I doubt that anything like Homo sapiens would ever evolve again," Gould mused, noting that being able to "replay the tape" and give history a do-over would be impossible. Yet since the publication of Wonderful Life, many evolutionary biologists have taken up this challenge and conducted their own versions of Gould's experiment, albeit on smaller scales. In doing so, they have reached different conclusions about the interplay between randomness of mutations, chance historical events, and directionality imparted by natural selection.

[...] Their review of comparative studies of "natural experiments" further illuminated evidence of evolution's predictability. Similar features can independently evolve in multiple species—for example, anole lizards of the Caribbean, which separately evolved traits such as the length of their legs and tails to ease their life in their specific habitats. Yet convergence in evolution does not always occur, as their review shows; contingency can play a strong role in divergent evolution of various traits.

Replaying the tape of life: Is it possible?

[Abstract]: Contingency and determinism in evolution: Replaying life’s tape

[Source]: IS IT POSSIBLE TO REPLAY THE TAPE OF LIFE?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday November 09 2018, @06:46PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday November 09 2018, @06:46PM (#759991)

    I think it explains why Quantum Physics continues to be pretty much ignored by most people. It really does turn the world upside down, if particle interactions are non-deterministic, yet the world that we interact with seems to be extremely deterministic.

    I think it comes down to the law of large numbers, if you average out enough randomness, you tend to get something that looks predictable.

    However, with evolution being driven by mutations (and conditions), and mutations being done at the molecular scale, I think it likely that you end up with race conditions. That is, evolution will go in direction X, unless something makes X bad before it can evolve.