Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Saturday December 01 2018, @08:00AM   Printer-friendly
from the how-many-copies-of-each-will-he-sell? dept.

Al Lowe reveals his Sierra source code collection—then puts it on eBay

Al Lowe, one of Sierra On-Line's seminal game creators and programmers, has been sitting on a pile of his original games' source code files for over 30 years, fully convinced that they are worthless.

Gallery: Taking a look back at some choice Sierra gaming moments"I’m 72 years old, and none of my kids want this junk!" Lowe said in an interview with YouTube personality MetalJesusRocks (aka Jason Lindsey, himself an ex-Sierra developer and a friend of Ars). "Does anybody?"

Lowe is about to find out, as the developer has begun posting eBay listings for his entire source-code collection. (You read that correctly. The whole shebang.) The sale's opening has been accompanied by a MetalJesusRocks video (embedded below), which offers a 12-minute tour of backed-up files, original game boxes, original hint books, and more.

As of press time, Lowe has listed auctions for the first two Leisure Suit Larry games' source code, with bids already climbing (both well above the $400 mark after they went live). Lowe indicated to Lindsey that more games' code will follow on eBay, and this will likely include a stunning treasure trove: Lowe's other Leisure Suit Larry games, King's Quest III, Police Quest I, and Lowe's games based on Disney franchises Winnie The Pooh and Black Cauldron.A truly graphic adventure: the 25-year rise and fall of a beloved genre

What's more, Lowe also has original backups of his complete programming pipeline, including the Sierra utilities that converted plain-text, ASCII commands to interpreted code. When pressed about how curious users could peruse these disks' files, Lowe plainly responds, "It's a text file! Put it in Notepad."

[...] Lowe's listings clarify a few things: first, he has not tested any of these disks, and second, owning these disks is not the same as owning the legal rights to freely or commercially distribute their contents. "Realize that, while you’ll have my data as of the day of Larry 1’s creation, you will not own the intellectual property rights to the game, the code, the art, or anything else," Lowe says in the LSL1 listing. "Nor do I. The IP rights were sold over and over again, until they are now owned by a German game company."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by urza9814 on Monday December 03 2018, @06:20PM (1 child)

    by urza9814 (3954) on Monday December 03 2018, @06:20PM (#769224) Journal

    If the author was not specifically required to surrender the original manuscript, it's his property

    Right. If you write a book, you generally do that on your own, and sell the rights once it's complete. So you can retain ownership of the originals if that's not specified in the contract. You're selling the IP rights to produce new copies, but most people wouldn't sell the original copy which already exists. So it exists, you own it, you didn't sell it already, so you can still sell it.

    But when writing software like this, when working directly for a company, it's a work for hire. You *never* owned the software which you wrote to begin with, therefore you have no right to sell it to anyone else. You already sold your rights to that copy before you even wrote it. You can't sell it again to someone else.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by Arik on Monday December 03 2018, @11:05PM

    by Arik (4543) on Monday December 03 2018, @11:05PM (#769330) Journal
    As I said, it's possible his former employer might have a cause of action against him.

    It's unlikely they could make anything criminal out of it due to statute of limitations but maybe a clever lawyer would argue and ongoing conspiracy to conceal it and manage to make it work.

    Most contractual issues would probably also be 'expired' in one way or another after all this time, but you'd have to pay a lawyer to go through all the original documents carefully to be anything like certain of the matter.

    Regardless, I don't see much worry for the buyer here. (IANYL TINLA)
    --
    If laughter is the best medicine, who are the best doctors?