Huawei Arrest Tests China's Leaders as Fear and Anger Grip Elite
The arrest of one of China's leading tech executives by the Canadian police for extradition to the United States has unleashed a combustible torrent of outrage and alarm among affluent and influential Chinese, posing a delicate political test for President Xi Jinping and his grip on the loyalty of the nation's elite.
The outpouring of conflicting sentiments — some Chinese have demanded a boycott of American products while others have expressed anxiety about their investments in the United States — underscores the unusual, politically charged nature of the Trump administration's latest move to counter China's drive for technological superiority.
In a hearing on Friday in Vancouver, Canadian prosecutors said the executive, Meng Wanzhou of the Chinese telecom giant Huawei, faced accusations of participating in a scheme to trick financial institutions into making transactions that violated United States sanctions against Iran.
Unlike a new round of tariffs or more tough rhetoric from American officials, the detention of Ms. Meng, the company's chief financial officer, appears to have driven home the intensifying rivalry between the United States and China in a visceral way for the Chinese establishment — and may force Mr. Xi to adopt a tougher stance against Washington, analysts said. In part, that is because Ms. Meng, 46, is so embedded in that establishment herself.
Previously: Canada Arrests Huawei's Global Chief Financial Officer in Vancouver
Related: New Law Bans U.S. Government from Buying Equipment from Chinese Telecom Giants ZTE and Huawei
Australia Bans China's Huawei (and maybe ZTE) from 5G Mobile Network Project
Washington Asks Allies to Drop Huawei
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday December 09 2018, @06:15AM (4 children)
They had to say something blustery to show that they are doing everything possible to get her out.
(Score: 2) by legont on Sunday December 09 2018, @07:04AM (3 children)
Hmm... it's rare in diplomacy because diplomats need a way to get the point across when it matters.
What "grave" is supposed to mean? In diplomatic terms I mean?
"Wealth is the relentless enemy of understanding" - John Kenneth Galbraith.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday December 09 2018, @08:01AM
In diplo-speak, "grave consequences" is usually the last escalation step of "talking" and before "actually doing things". A final warning.
(Score: 1) by khallow on Sunday December 09 2018, @02:52PM
Anything from nothing to bombs flying. Here, I think if the US has solid evidence of wrong-doing by Meng Wanzhou, the mention of "grave consequences" is not going to amount to much. China isn't going to defend an obvious crook.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday December 09 2018, @02:58PM
Grave consequences was in the press release. They probably said something else to the Canadian ambassador.