SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
The U.S. Just Became a Net Oil Exporter for the First Time in 75 Years:
America turned into a net oil exporter last week, breaking almost 75 years of continued dependence on foreign oil and marking a pivotal -- even if likely brief -- moment toward what U.S. President Donald Trump has branded as "energy independence."
The shift to net exports is the dramatic result of an unprecedented boom in American oil production, with thousands of wells pumping from the Permian region of Texas and New Mexico to the Bakken in North Dakota to the Marcellus in Pennsylvania.
While the country has been heading in that direction for years, this week's dramatic shift came as data showed a sharp drop in imports and a jump in exports to a record high. Given the volatility in weekly data, the U.S. will likely remain a small net importer most of the time.
"We are becoming the dominant energy power in the world," said Michael Lynch, president of Strategic Energy & Economic Research. "But, because the change is gradual over time, I don't think it's going to cause a huge revolution, but you do have to think that OPEC is going to have to take that into account when they think about cutting."
The shale revolution has transformed oil wildcatters into billionaires and the U.S. into the world's largest petroleum producer, surpassing Russia and Saudi Arabia. The power of OPEC has been diminished, undercutting one of the major geopolitical forces of the last half century.
I can see short-term benefits (avoiding another 1973 Oil Crisis), but am concerned about the long-term strategy. Given a fixed supply of oil, isn't the US just racing to deplete its resources and therefore setting itself up for a later "oil crisis"? The only hope I see is a huge and continued emphasis in transitioning to alternative energy sources (be it solar, wind, and/or nuclear) and thus ween itself from dependence on foreign supplies.
(Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Monday December 10 2018, @12:33AM (15 children)
Oil reserves are not wasted. Saving them for 1000 years or more is not wasting them, it's not even noticeable in the larger geological timeframe they have been accumulating.
Civilization has been building cities for 5000 years, just because we set aside a resource for longer than the current age of the US constitution does not mean it is wasted.
If you're thinking in terms of the remaining lifespan of the people in power, sure, but any of them who are deluded enough to think that their personal fortunes for their remaining decade or three of life should matter more than the future of the planet should be sent to Vegas to do hookers and blow for the rest of their natural life, and get them the hell away from making decisions that affect future generations.
Україна досі не є частиною Росії Слава Україні🌻 https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2023/06/24/7408365/
(Score: 2) by takyon on Monday December 10 2018, @01:00AM (7 children)
Ideally, the people of 100-1,000+ years from now will not be using much oil (outside of small, niche uses not comparable to today's consumption numbers). If they are using oil, it better be because of a post-apocalypse scenario.
Perhaps it would be better for humanity if it was sent back to the Dark Ages, but without cheap, easy-to-locate-and-exploit petroleum resources. Or maybe it would just be a different flavor of bad. But without a massive catastrophe, our civilization should reach a point where it leaves oil in the ground and uses mostly batteries, or maybe hydrogen cells, etc.
[SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
(Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Monday December 10 2018, @02:44AM (6 children)
I agree that the future of oil is niche, extremely small as compared to the last 50-100 years.
I disagree about batteries - almost as bad IMO, I do hope they (in their current form, at least) are even shorter lived than the internal combustion engine.
Україна досі не є частиною Росії Слава Україні🌻 https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2023/06/24/7408365/
(Score: 3, Insightful) by takyon on Monday December 10 2018, @03:26AM (5 children)
Umm, everyone here has seen dozens of stories [sciencedaily.com] about new battery technologies being worked on by researchers. It seems likely that one or more of these will eventually pan out and batteries will not remain in their current form in the coming decades and centuries.
[SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
(Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Monday December 10 2018, @05:58PM (4 children)
Moving from Lithium to Fluorine doesn't seem like a great step on the "nasty to handle" scale, and if I infer correctly, a Lithium-Fluorine battery would be even better - energy density wise.
Україна досі не є частиною Росії Слава Україні🌻 https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2023/06/24/7408365/
(Score: 2) by takyon on Monday December 10 2018, @06:37PM (3 children)
*Fluoride [soylentnews.org]
It's just one of many contenders. If it's not safe to crash an electric car filled with fluoride-ion batteries, or carry around a phone or laptop with it, then it probably won't be used, or will be restricted to certain applications.
Although it would be fun if we realized a 10x improvement in battery energy density and all consumer electronics became like bombs.
[SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
(Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Monday December 10 2018, @08:36PM (2 children)
If you look back at the carbon (non-alkaline) batteries of the 1960s and leap forward to Li-Ion, I think it already looks like that.
Україна досі не є частиною Росії Слава Україні🌻 https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2023/06/24/7408365/
(Score: 2) by takyon on Tuesday December 11 2018, @07:54PM (1 child)
TSA has been very cagey over people taking laptops onto planes in recent years. They have a procedure where you need to have your laptop out during the scan, and they can get even more suspicious if you have two laptops.
So if battery energy density was to suddenly go up by 10x, I can only imagine even more draconian measures. And I'll avoid them (hopefully) by taking a car or Greyhound instead.
[SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
(Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Tuesday December 11 2018, @09:30PM
TSA really sucked all the joy out of air travel - I'm very glad that we can do substantial telecommuting now.
Україна досі не є частиною Росії Слава Україні🌻 https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2023/06/24/7408365/
(Score: 1, Insightful) by khallow on Monday December 10 2018, @01:15AM (6 children)
And I see you ignore economic time value [wikipedia.org] here. Yes, it is wasting those resources. There is nothing we'd be using those resources for in a thousand years, especially when adjusted for sitting on the resource for a thousand years (and moving on to non-fossil fuel resources as well), that is more valuable than what we could do with it now.
Remember the benefits and wealth of our societies accumulate over that thousand year period too. If we accumulate many such poor decisions as forgoing a valuable resource for some purely imaginary future benefit a thousand years from now, then what sort of impoverished society will we have left in a thousand years?
You're the only one displaying a hugely flawed understanding of the future beyond that remaining lifespan.
(Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Monday December 10 2018, @02:48AM (5 children)
Nowhere in this thesis is there value assigned to persons not yet born, nor the value of ecosystems which are fundamental to the survival of all people. If that is not viewed as fundamentally flawed, then the future is doomed.
But, what do you care? You'll be dead.
Україна досі не є частиною Росії Слава Україні🌻 https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2023/06/24/7408365/
(Score: 2, Insightful) by khallow on Monday December 10 2018, @03:37PM (4 children)
There are two flaws in your claim. First, there's no point to making things worse now so that we can have a worse future as well. Way too many of the climate change fixes make high fertility people poorer now. That means more people in a worse future later. Meanwhile what we save now by not pursuing harmful and counterproductive climate change mitigation strategies goes to making a better future. Second, time value works beautifully for the very things you speak of. Assign value to these future things and you still have time value.
(Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Monday December 10 2018, @05:55PM (3 children)
Name your fallacy: https://thebestschools.org/magazine/15-logical-fallacies-know/ [thebestschools.org]
Україна досі не є частиною Росії Слава Україні🌻 https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2023/06/24/7408365/
(Score: 1) by khallow on Monday December 10 2018, @07:33PM (2 children)
(Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Monday December 10 2018, @08:43PM (1 child)
Prescient, are we?
Україна досі не є частиною Росії Слава Україні🌻 https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2023/06/24/7408365/
(Score: 1) by khallow on Tuesday December 11 2018, @02:48AM