NASA's Voyager 2 Probe Enters Interstellar Space
For the second time in history, a human-made object has reached the space between the stars. NASA's Voyager 2 probe now has exited the heliosphere - the protective bubble of particles and magnetic fields created by the Sun.
Members of NASA's Voyager team will discuss the findings at a news conference at 11 a.m. EST (8 a.m. PST) today at the meeting of the American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Washington. The news conference will stream live on the agency's website.
Comparing data from different instruments aboard the trailblazing spacecraft, mission scientists determined the probe crossed the outer edge of the heliosphere on Nov. 5. This boundary, called the heliopause, is where the tenuous, hot solar wind meets the cold, dense interstellar medium. Its twin, Voyager 1, crossed this boundary in 2012, but Voyager 2 carries a working instrument that will provide first-of-its-kind observations of the nature of this gateway into interstellar space.
Voyager 2 now is slightly more than 11 billion miles (18 billion kilometers) from Earth. Mission operators still can communicate with Voyager 2 as it enters this new phase of its journey, but information - moving at the speed of light - takes about 16.5 hours to travel from the spacecraft to Earth. By comparison, light traveling from the Sun takes about eight minutes to reach Earth.
(Score: 3, Funny) by Runaway1956 on Monday December 10 2018, @07:37PM (16 children)
I have found God.
He sends his love.
Yours Truly,
V'ger
“I have become friends with many school shooters” - Tampon Tim Walz
(Score: 2) by PartTimeZombie on Monday December 10 2018, @09:05PM
Hey V'ger
Can you ask God to pick up some milk on his way home?
Ta.
(Score: 3, Funny) by DannyB on Monday December 10 2018, @10:31PM (8 children)
Didn't he already send his love?
Santa maintains a database and does double verification of it.
(Score: 3, Touché) by bob_super on Monday December 10 2018, @10:54PM (6 children)
*Citation needed*
(not from fairy tales books)
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 10 2018, @11:57PM (3 children)
I'm sure she's up there, somewhere, shouting down how much she loves us, wondering why we can't hear her.
(Score: 1, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday December 11 2018, @12:37AM (1 child)
She knows why you can't hear her. It's because men never listen.
(Score: 1) by khallow on Tuesday December 11 2018, @01:47PM
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday December 11 2018, @12:57AM
Because it makes your head explode ...
(Score: 3, Interesting) by DannyB on Tuesday December 11 2018, @03:19PM
I'm not sure what you're getting at. Evidence that Jesus existed and walked the earth? There is more evidence for that than we have evidence that Julius Ceasar ever existed.
You can believe about Jesus what you want.
It's not a debate I'm going to get in to. That debate like talking to a rabid Trump supporter. (pardon the redundancy)
For your amusement, I'll leave a quote from Luke 16:27-31. [blueletterbible.org]
Point being: no amount of historical text, no matter from what book, what author, historian, etc, would be convincing.
So there is really nothing of substance to discuss, IMO. You believe, or you don't. We can agree to disaggree, agreeably.
Santa maintains a database and does double verification of it.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday December 11 2018, @11:27PM
Not a problem [soylentnews.org]:
(Score: 1, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday December 11 2018, @02:08PM
Sure. Unfortunately He sent it in a form unsuitable for human consumption, and trying to incorporate it into the human mind caused it to be converted into hate. Hopefully He has learned from His mistake and uses a more suitable form of love in further attempts.
(Score: 4, Funny) by Thexalon on Tuesday December 11 2018, @01:17AM (5 children)
Alternate version is the following reply:
"Think of how stupid the average person is. Then realize half of 'em are stupider than that." - George Carlin
(Score: 3, Interesting) by bob_super on Tuesday December 11 2018, @01:27AM (3 children)
Well, since the directions to the house are wrong [forbes.com], we're safe from ending up on a shit list.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday December 11 2018, @02:16PM
But not the poor inhabitants of the planet which the aliens will wrongly identify as the source based on that map ...
(Score: 2) by tangomargarine on Tuesday December 11 2018, @04:53PM (1 child)
This is one of those "technically correct but completely useless" arguments physicists like to make: who is going to be around to care whether aliens find us in millions of years? As long as the map stays relatively accurate for, say, 2000 more years, that's plenty.
Doesn't this whole argument presuppose that the aliens have some way to get here? If they have warp drive, I think their computer can crunch some numbers to find the pulsars.
"Is that really true?" "I just spent the last hour telling you to think for yourself! Didn't you hear anything I said?"
(Score: 2) by bob_super on Tuesday December 11 2018, @05:25PM
I think the point is that those pulsars will not look exactly the same from someone else's standpoint, and it's therefore easy to misidentify which of the billions we tried to refer to.
Having 14 on the map makes it more likely that a partial match will be found anyway, but that depends on their observation skills.
First, the Aliens will have to recover from the horrible sight of those terrible shameful naked human drawings (if they grab Pioneer, or decode the golden record).
> If they have warp drive, I think their computer can crunch some numbers to find the pulsars.
We barely had computers when we went to the moon. We didn't have computers when we crossed oceans to find isolated Pacific islands. Computers are a pretty new thing to us, and may not be needed by others.
Anyway, they'll just follow the gravity trail the probe left, all the way back to us. That's a much simpler and reliable way to track your food through space.
(Score: 3, Funny) by khallow on Tuesday December 11 2018, @02:09PM
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 10 2018, @08:40PM (19 children)
18 billion kilometers is about 120.3AU.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 10 2018, @09:10PM (7 children)
16.5 lumino-gravitio hours.
(Score: 1, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 10 2018, @10:50PM (6 children)
5 minutes at warp 6
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 10 2018, @11:59PM (2 children)
TOS scale or TNG scale?
(Score: 2) by isostatic on Tuesday December 11 2018, @12:52AM
Nope
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday December 11 2018, @07:27AM
TOS
(Score: 2, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday December 11 2018, @12:13AM (2 children)
Not to be a pedant, but warp 1 is speed of light, warp 10 is infinite velocity (TNG rules) or 6^3 * C (TOS rules): http://www.anycalculator.com/warpcalculator.htm [anycalculator.com]
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday December 11 2018, @12:14AM
"6^3 * C" should read: W^3 * C
(Score: 2, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday December 11 2018, @07:30AM
It's 16 hours to V2, not minutes
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 10 2018, @09:14PM (3 children)
It is also about 89,460,669,138 furlongs.
(Score: 2) by Gaaark on Monday December 10 2018, @11:14PM
And 6 of one, half dozen of the other.
--- Please remind me if I haven't been civil to you: I'm channeling MDC. ---Gaaark 2.0 ---
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday December 11 2018, @03:37PM
Which is 7406032787 Rob Furlongs [wikipedia.org].
It's a much larger number of Edward Furlongs [wikipedia.org], which is only a measure of how fast one can descend.
(Score: 3, Touché) by Thexalon on Tuesday December 11 2018, @05:53PM
For MIT grads, that's about 10.6x10^12 smoots.
"Think of how stupid the average person is. Then realize half of 'em are stupider than that." - George Carlin
(Score: 2) by DannyB on Monday December 10 2018, @10:39PM (5 children)
That's about 5.5548 x 1011 atto parsecs.
Santa maintains a database and does double verification of it.
(Score: 2) by PartTimeZombie on Monday December 10 2018, @11:08PM (2 children)
What's that in linguine?
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 10 2018, @11:54PM (1 child)
four
(Score: 2) by PartTimeZombie on Tuesday December 11 2018, @10:42PM
Thanks.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 10 2018, @11:34PM (1 child)
How many Kessel runs is that?
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 10 2018, @11:56PM
More than 4.9e-5
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday December 11 2018, @02:22PM
Or 1.1·1048 Planck lengths.
BTW, given that 18 billion kilometers has only two significant digits, identifying it with 120.3 AU is simply wrong. It's just 120 AU.
(Score: 5, Insightful) by coolgopher on Monday December 10 2018, @10:10PM (8 children)
What really impresses me, aside from the longevity of these probes and the solid engineering that must've gone into them, is that it's still managing to transmit data back to us across these distances. With that directional dish I imagine it wouldn't take more than a sliver of a degree of error to completely miss our tiny pale dot.
(Score: 4, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 10 2018, @10:39PM (1 child)
It actually gets easier to aim at earth the farther away you are since the beam is wider:
https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/13227/how-earth-communicates-with-voyager-i [stackexchange.com]
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 10 2018, @11:58PM
I think all you have to do point at the sun.
(Score: 4, Informative) by legont on Monday December 10 2018, @10:43PM (3 children)
The source code is, at least partially, lost https://money.cnn.com/2015/10/27/technology/voyager-nasa/ [cnn.com]
"Wealth is the relentless enemy of understanding" - John Kenneth Galbraith.
(Score: 2) by Kilo110 on Tuesday December 11 2018, @12:31AM (2 children)
I wonder what'd happen if voyager patches were publicly done online through github or something. I bet lots of really smart programmers would jump at the chance to push code to voyager.
(Score: 5, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday December 11 2018, @12:34AM
Yeah but within two weeks the Ruby on Rails code pushed by a millennial programmer would break because of a dependency problem and then the Voyager would be lost forever.
(Score: 3, Informative) by legont on Tuesday December 11 2018, @01:01AM
It would be nice to look at... but meantime one could get a job. The requirements are assembler, Fortran (without numbers:) and, believe it or not, COBOL https://www.geek.com/news/nasa-seeks-programmer-fluent-in-60-year-old-languages-to-work-on-voyager-1638276/ [geek.com]
I am, or should I say used to be, proficient in all.
"Wealth is the relentless enemy of understanding" - John Kenneth Galbraith.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday December 11 2018, @12:31AM (1 child)
Duh, they've been faking the whole thing. The data is created in North Hampford, Sussex, then bounced off the moon and picked up by a receiver in New Zealand from which it is fed into a delay circuit to simulate distance from earth before being rebroadcast one last time. Similar to how they did the video "from the moon".
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday December 11 2018, @04:33AM
The only honest money left since the voyager project began is the nickle. Quarters, dimes, half dollars, dollars should all be silver, and all higher denominations gold.
(Score: 3, Informative) by bradley13 on Tuesday December 11 2018, @06:11AM (2 children)
dense interstellar medium
Who writes this stuff? The Voyagers are amazing, the PR flaks less so...
Everyone is somebody else's weirdo.
(Score: 3, Touché) by martyb on Tuesday December 11 2018, @12:17PM
=)
Wit is intellect, dancing.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday December 11 2018, @02:27PM
Compared with the intergalactic medium, the interstellar medium is dense. Just as compared with the interstellar medium, the best vacuum we can achieve on Earth is still dense.
Not that I think that's what the writers of the article had in mind, though.
(Score: 2) by All Your Lawn Are Belong To Us on Tuesday December 11 2018, @09:58PM
Oblig xkcd [xkcd.com] about its brother.
This sig for rent.