Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Saturday July 19 2014, @12:15PM   Printer-friendly
from the who-was-not-a-Jeopardy-contestant dept.

SCOTUSblog tells us:

Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan refused on Thursday afternoon to block a federal appeals court ruling against continued copyright protection for fictional detective Sherlock Holmes, for any stories about him that have entered the public domain. Kagan acted without even asking for a response from an author who is preparing a new Holmes anthology, and she gave no explanation for her denial of a stay.

More background on the case and details about the filing in this detailed earlier SCOTUSblog post which notes:

[Sir Arthur Conan] Doyle has been dead for eighty-four years, but because of extensions of copyright terms, ten of his fifty-six short stories continue to be protected from copying. All of the short stories and four novels were published between 1887 and 1927, but all of the collection except ten short stories have entered into the public domain as copyrights expired.

The Doyle estate, though, is pressing a quite unusual copyright theory. It contends that, since Doyle continued to develop the characters of Holmes and Watson throughout all of the stories, the characters themselves cannot be copied even for what Doyle wrote about them in the works that are now part of the public domain and thus ordinarily would be fair game for use by others.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by maxwell demon on Sunday July 20 2014, @03:56PM

    by maxwell demon (1608) on Sunday July 20 2014, @03:56PM (#71527) Journal

    Getting legal or health advice from comments on news stories isn't healthy.

    Hmmm ... I've read that in a comment on a news story ... so I basically should ignore this advice? But then, ignoring it would imply not ignoring it ...

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by PizzaRollPlinkett on Sunday July 20 2014, @04:32PM

    by PizzaRollPlinkett (4512) on Sunday July 20 2014, @04:32PM (#71543)

    You cracked the code! The subtle interpretation is to both take and ignore the advice at the same time. If it works, credit your own cleverness; if it does not work, you have someone to blame. In other words, use quantum mechanics to defer whether you take or ignore the advice until you measure the outcome, then make a final commitment. Maybe this is getting too "meta" for a story about fan fiction.

    Hey, I always wanted to write some Star Wars fan fiction. I had several novels outlined. Then Disney bought them. So I thought - why would I write anything for a Disney property? Very discouraging. For me - whether it is for anyone else depends on your opinion of fan fiction - but I think I could do better than Kevin J. Anderson. Actually, the monkeys with typewriters...

    --
    (E-mail me if you want a pizza roll!)