Anti-vaccine nonsense spurred NY's largest outbreak in decades
Health officials in New York are cautiously optimistic that they have a large measles outbreak under control after tackling the noxious anti-vaccine myths and unfounded fears that fueled the disease's spread.
Since last fall, New York has tallied 177 confirmed cases of measles, the largest outbreak the state has seen in decades. It began with infected travelers, arriving from parts of Israel and Europe where the highly contagious disease was spreading. In New York, that spread has largely been confined to ultra-Orthodox Jewish communities. As measles rippled through those insular religious communities, health officials ran into members who were wary of outsiders as well as those who harbor harmful myths and fears about vaccines. This included the completely false-yet-pernicious belief that the measles vaccine causes autism.
To quash the outbreak, health officials met with rabbis and pediatricians in the community, who in turned urged community members to be vigilant and, above all, get vaccinated, according to The New York Times. "Good people, great parents were terrified," Rabbi Yakov Horowitz, founder of Darchei Noam yeshiva in Monsey in Rockland County, told the Times. Despite the fears, he insisted parents vaccinate their children. "They felt that I was asking to give their children something that would harm them."
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 21 2019, @05:01AM (1 child)
There are still about 20k cases of measles like illness (no chicken pox isn't one) each year.
https://soylentnews.org/comments.pl?noupdate=1&sid=29667&page=1&cid=788467#commentwrap [soylentnews.org]
(Score: 1) by khallow on Monday January 21 2019, @02:58PM
Which aren't measles nor necessarily virus-related (contrary to your assertion in that post). For example, rashes from first time allergic reactions could trigger such a test with nothing infectious involved.
Rashes and fevers can come from a variety of causes and doctors in the US have long taken a stand of better safe and profitable, than sorry when it comes to medical tests. It's far easier and a bit more profitable to run a test for measles given a vague suspicion than to chance it and risk malpractice lawsuits.