Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by chromas on Wednesday January 23 2019, @10:24AM   Printer-friendly
from the stop-being-poor dept.

U.S. insulin costs per patient nearly doubled from 2012 to 2016, study finds

The cost of insulin for treating Type 1 diabetes in the United States nearly doubled over a recent five-year period, underscoring a national outcry over rising drug prices, according to a new analysis.

A patient with Type 1 diabetes incurred annual insulin costs of $5,705, on average, in 2016. The average cost was roughly half that, at $2,864 per patient, in 2012, according to a report released on Tuesday by the nonprofit Health Care Cost Institute.

The figures represent the combined amount paid by a patient and their health plan for the medicine and do not reflect rebates paid at a later date.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 23 2019, @08:07PM (4 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 23 2019, @08:07PM (#790782)

    Oh, so centralized/socialized medicine works fine until politics messes it up. Is that what happens?

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   -1  
       Troll=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Troll' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   -1  
  • (Score: 2) by Azuma Hazuki on Wednesday January 23 2019, @11:28PM (2 children)

    by Azuma Hazuki (5086) on Wednesday January 23 2019, @11:28PM (#790911) Journal

    Because politicians who are against it mess it up. You may as well say there's no point to having a lock on your door because a criminal can mess it up with, for example, a can of liquid N2 and a good swift kick.

    Of course I know what you were really trying to say/do here, but it doesn't work, so I'm replying to vaccinate anyone unfortunate enough to read your bullshit against the stinkin' thinkin' in your post. FOaD, post-haste.

    --
    I am "that girl" your mother warned you about...
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 23 2019, @11:39PM (1 child)

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 23 2019, @11:39PM (#790917)

      You may as well say there's no point to having a lock on your door because a criminal can mess it up with, for example, a can of liquid N2 and a good swift kick.

      Not a good analogy. It isn't inevitable that someone is going to break the lock. It is inevitable that politicians will mess up whatever it is they try to do and make it 10x more expensive than it needs to be (at least in the US).

      • (Score: 2) by hendrikboom on Friday January 25 2019, @02:54PM

        by hendrikboom (1125) on Friday January 25 2019, @02:54PM (#791780) Homepage Journal

        What is it about the US that ensures that politicians will mess up whatever it is they try to do and make it 10x more expensive than it needs to be?

        Is it something in the constitution that has this effect?

        -- hendrik

  • (Score: 2) by PartTimeZombie on Thursday January 24 2019, @01:18AM

    by PartTimeZombie (4827) on Thursday January 24 2019, @01:18AM (#790963)

    Oh, so centralized/socialized medicine works fine...

    Socialized medicine works so well, that once a country tries it, it becomes so popular that it winds up being a political consensus. Any party which offers to dismantle it loses elections. In the case of my country, they lose badly.

    The UK has the problem that there is a section of the Conservative party that thinks 1910 was the best time to be alive. And it was if you're the Earl of somewhere, or your Grandfather made a fortune from coal or wool.

    They are doing their level best to take Britain back to that time, with the help of people like Rupert Murdoch.