Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by takyon on Wednesday January 23 2019, @09:22PM   Printer-friendly
from the class-excavation dept.

Core blimey... When is an AMD CPU core not a CPU core? It's now up to a jury of 12 to decide

A class-action lawsuit against AMD claiming false advertising over its "eight core" FX processors has been given the go-ahead by a California judge.

US district judge Haywood Gilliam last week rejected [PDF] AMD's claim that "a significant majority" of people understood the term "core" the same way it did as "not persuasive."

What tech buyers imagine represents a core when it comes to processors would be a significant part of such a lawsuit, the judge noted, and so AMD's arguments were "premature."

The so-called "eight core" chips contain four Bulldozer modules, the lawsuit notes, and these "sub-processors" each contain a pair of instruction-executing CPU cores. So, four modules times two CPU cores equals, in AMD's mind, eight CPU cores.

And here's the sticking point: these two CPU cores, within a single Bulldozer module, share caches, frontend circuitry, and a single floating point unit (FPU). These shared resources cause bottlenecks that can slow the processor, it is claimed.

The plaintiffs, who sued back in 2015, argue that they bought a chip they thought would have eight independent processor cores – the advertising said it was the "first native 8-core desktop processor" – and paid a premium for that.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Mykl on Wednesday January 23 2019, @10:12PM (6 children)

    by Mykl (1112) on Wednesday January 23 2019, @10:12PM (#790850)

    What other technical terms with well established meanings became meaningless due to marketing and advertisements?

    Cloud enabled
    Scalable
    Modern displays with refresh rates in Hertz
    "Hacker"

    Any more?

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 3, Funny) by BsAtHome on Wednesday January 23 2019, @10:23PM

    by BsAtHome (889) on Wednesday January 23 2019, @10:23PM (#790857)

    Please stop! I'm going to fill-up my bullshit bingo card prematurely.

  • (Score: 1, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday January 24 2019, @01:12AM (3 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday January 24 2019, @01:12AM (#790959)

    Please update your response to include "synergy" and "game changer".

    • (Score: 2) by Reziac on Thursday January 24 2019, @02:56AM (2 children)

      by Reziac (2489) on Thursday January 24 2019, @02:56AM (#791007) Homepage

      And don't forget "leverage".

      --
      And there is no Alkibiades to come back and save us from ourselves.
      • (Score: 2, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday January 24 2019, @07:22AM (1 child)

        by Anonymous Coward on Thursday January 24 2019, @07:22AM (#791118)

        Seriously. No blockchain?

        • (Score: 2) by DannyB on Thursday January 24 2019, @04:46PM

          by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Thursday January 24 2019, @04:46PM (#791288) Journal

          It's called Crypto now.

          They talk about "crypto" and don't realize that word already has an established meaning predating digital currency.

          --
          The Jupiter 2 is headed into a region of highly energized saran wrap.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 25 2019, @11:44PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 25 2019, @11:44PM (#792100)

    One of my favorites was "Contrast Ratio" on monitors. I remember seeing displays proclaiming 10,000,000:1 and other nonsense until finally everyone realized the numbers were meaningless and stopped paying attention to them.

    "AI" is a big one now. One of the products I work on suddenly has "AI". That's not to say that some of the things it does isn't kind of a rudimentary AI, but all the things that marketing loves to talk up now it's actually done for several years. But 5 years ago it wasn't sexy to call that stuff "AI" and today it is.