Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by LaminatorX on Wednesday February 26 2014, @12:30PM   Printer-friendly
from the Boot-him?-I-just-met-him! dept.

jbernardo writes:

"Having had several issues with systemd, and really not liking the philosophy behind it, I am looking into alternatives. I really prefer something that follows the Unix philosophy of using small, focused, and independent tools, with a clear interface. Unfortunately, my favourite distro, Arch Linux, is very much pro-systemd, and a discussion of alternatives is liable to get you banned for a month from their forums. There is an effort to support openrc, but it is still in its infancy and without much support.

So, what are the alternatives, besides Gentoo? Preferably binary... I'd rather have something like arch, with quick updates, cutting edge, but I've already used a lot in the past Mandrake, RedHat, SourceMage, Debian, Kubuntu, and so on, so the package format or the package management differences don't scare me."

[ED Note: I'm imagining FreeBSD sitting in the room with the all the Linux distros he mentioned being utterly ignored like Canada in Hetalia.]

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Insightful) by omoc on Wednesday February 26 2014, @02:49PM

    by omoc (39) on Wednesday February 26 2014, @02:49PM (#7306)

    What I'd like to see is a modern distribution with Linux Kernel and BSD userland. OpenBSD is a joke on a modern desktop. Archlinux was initially awesome but has long given up on that path, is there something else?

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by frojack on Wednesday February 26 2014, @08:25PM

    by frojack (1554) on Wednesday February 26 2014, @08:25PM (#7537) Journal

    That seems backwards.

    You want a unix kernel, with Linux pacakage (ports) availability.

    OpenBSD is not that bad if you hang KDE on it. I've played with that for a few months.
    Its serviceable.

    Still, for security you want FreeBSD, not OpenBSD. Those FreeBSD guys are all about security.
    My next firewall will be FreeBSD.

    --
    No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
    • (Score: 3, Informative) by frojack on Wednesday February 26 2014, @08:29PM

      by frojack (1554) on Wednesday February 26 2014, @08:29PM (#7539) Journal

      DAMMIT, I got that backwards.
      OpenBSD is indeed the one you want,not FreeBSD.

      FreeBSD probably has more ports, but it is security challenged.

      --
      No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
      • (Score: 1) by electron on Wednesday February 26 2014, @10:43PM

        by electron (1678) on Wednesday February 26 2014, @10:43PM (#7599)

        I use OpenBSD as my only desktop with xfce and have had no problems.

      • (Score: 0) by Bill, Shooter Of Bul on Wednesday February 26 2014, @10:52PM

        by Bill, Shooter Of Bul (3170) on Wednesday February 26 2014, @10:52PM (#7606)

        Yeah, that first post was confusing.

        If you really wanted FreeBSD with GNU userland, well Debian has the kfreebsd port. It will not be using systemd for obvious reasons.

        OpenBSD does a really good job.