Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by Ethanol-fueled on Wednesday February 27 2019, @12:34AM (3 children)

    by Ethanol-fueled (2792) on Wednesday February 27 2019, @12:34AM (#807376) Homepage

    Thinking about running RAID 1. Would that be feasible in a modern desktop (performance/stability etc.) or should I get a dedicated SAN?

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 27 2019, @10:33AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 27 2019, @10:33AM (#807528)

    ZFS is a lot easier and nicer than "real" RAID though, plus it has NFS built in and makes backups super easy. I would go dedicated, just because it will save you a lot on your energy bill (but if the PC never gets shut down just use that if you've got space in the case).

  • (Score: 3, Informative) by hendrikboom on Friday March 08 2019, @10:56PM (1 child)

    by hendrikboom (1125) Subscriber Badge on Friday March 08 2019, @10:56PM (#811804) Homepage Journal

    Running software RAID 1 on an ancient intel desktop tower. It gathers too much dist on the floor.
    I set up partitions on two hard drives, combine them into a RAID 1, and put lvm on top of that.
    This setup has worked for years, and has survived several hard drive failures.

    Some space is left out of the RAID in case it's useful, for example, in case booting is best done from an off-RAID or I want a machine-readable marker do distinguish the two physical drives.

    And backups are on USB drives, kept disconnected except when actually backing up or restoring.