Something I've been thinking about a bit lately is the ability to communicate your message well. I'm not the best at it but it's not difficult to spot those who really are. Their number sure as fuck doesn't include Jordan Peterson. Or most any intellectual, especially with an academia background, for that matter.
You know who the best are? Really good standup comedians. They have to be. If you need to explain a joke, it's no longer funny. If you're consistently not funny, you have to get a dreaded day job.
If you want to take up public speaking in any sort of persuasive capacity, you could do a lot worse than to learn from them.
(Score: 3, Informative) by NotSanguine on Wednesday March 13 2019, @03:59AM
You're comparing apples to oranges. Playing on emotions as a comedian does is a much different form of communication than conveying knowledge and information.
Making someone laugh, cry or get angry requires significantly different skills and strategies from expositing complex sets of ideas like quantum mechanics, demand curves or game theory.
Louis CK would crash and burn trying to explain cell regulation through potassium channels. However, a biologist would likely be able to do so fairly well, even if he or she ended up pelted with rotten fruit at a comedy club's open mike night.
That's not to say that academics are all wonderful communicators of ideas, especially in verbal contexts. However, many do communicate well verbally.