Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by takyon on Monday April 01 2019, @09:35PM   Printer-friendly
from the gaaarlaktus dept.

From New Atlas:

Some of the strongest evidence for dark matter to date has been discovered – and ironically, that's thanks to its absence. In a pair of studies published this week, astronomers have shed new light on dark matter through close observation of a galaxy previously found to have very little of the stuff, while the same team found a new example of a similar oddball galaxy.

It's generally believed that galaxies are held together through the gravitational influence of clumps of dark matter, so to find a galaxy with little to no dark matter was a surprise. And while it might sound like a strike against the theory, it actually ends up supporting it.

A Second Galaxy Missing Dark Matter in the NGC 1052 Group (DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab0d92) (DX)

Still Missing Dark Matter: KCWI High-resolution Stellar Kinematics of NGC1052-DF2 (DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab0e8c) (DX)


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Tuesday April 02 2019, @05:37AM (3 children)

    by FatPhil (863) <{pc-soylent} {at} {asdf.fi}> on Tuesday April 02 2019, @05:37AM (#823465) Homepage
    If the measurements are correct, they are incompatible with MOND, as galaxies the visibly look similar to these rotate differently to these. So something invisible must be making a difference. One might say that they're compatible with MOND where you get to tune a parameter for each individual galaxy, but in that case you might say that it's compatible with the light dots being sky megasheep being herded by different sky megashepherds. 'taint good testable physics, mate.
    --
    Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: -1, Flamebait) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday April 02 2019, @05:44AM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday April 02 2019, @05:44AM (#823467)

    You are beyond hope sir. I mean really, you have lost touch with reality. Once you start denying that a priori predictions that turn out consistent with the data are support for the theory they came from, it is over. You have your religion and aren't giving it up.

    • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Tuesday April 02 2019, @07:37PM (1 child)

      by FatPhil (863) <{pc-soylent} {at} {asdf.fi}> on Tuesday April 02 2019, @07:37PM (#823752) Homepage
      Absolute nonsense. All science is done by observing what is observable, forming a model, and then testing it against other observable things.
      --
      Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
      • (Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday April 03 2019, @02:00AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday April 03 2019, @02:00AM (#823897)

        What in the world are you responding to?

        This is hilarious.