Slash Boxes

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 16 submissions in the queue.
posted by Fnord666 on Wednesday April 03 2019, @11:14PM   Printer-friendly
from the privacy-policies-are-for-suckers dept.

Submitted via IRC for chromas

FamilyTreeDNA Deputizes Itself, Starts Pitching DNA Matching Services To Law Enforcement

One DNA-matching company has decided it's going to corner an under-served market: US law enforcement. FamilyTreeDNA -- last seen here opening up its database to the FBI without informing its users first -- is actively pitching its services to law enforcement.

The television spot, to air in San Diego first, asks anyone who has had a direct-to-consumer DNA test from another company, like 23andMe or, to upload a copy so that law enforcement can spot any connections to DNA found at crime scenes.

The advertisement features Ed Smart, father of Elizabeth Smart, a Salt Lake City teen who was abducted in 2002 but later found alive. “If you are one of the millions of people who have taken a DNA test, your help can provide the missing link,” he says in the spot.

Welcome to FamilyTreeDNA's cooperating witness program -- one it profits from by selling information customers give it to law enforcement. The tug at the heartstrings is a nice touch. FamilyTreeDNA is finally being upfront with users about its intentions for their DNA samples. This is due to its founder deciding -- without consulting his customers -- that they're all as willing as he is to convert your DNA samples into public goods.

Bennett Greenspan, the firm’s founder, said he had decided he had a moral obligation to help solve old murders and rapes. Now he thinks that customers will agree and make their DNA available specifically to help out.

Original Submission

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday April 04 2019, @04:26AM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday April 04 2019, @04:26AM (#824361)

    Turn back the clock to simpler times? To the golden age? Of rapists walking free?

    You can't uninvent this stuff.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday April 04 2019, @08:36AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday April 04 2019, @08:36AM (#824397)

    And yet you can't get humans to act in a civilized manner. Rich or poor, short or tall, polka dots or stripes, some humans will always be the vilest of creatures.

  • (Score: 2, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday April 04 2019, @11:53AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday April 04 2019, @11:53AM (#824430)

    No, but you can regulate how they use the technology and who they give the data to. And, using it to violate the privacy of people en masse is something that should be banned, along with all forms of mass surveillance.