Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by LaminatorX on Thursday February 27 2014, @05:00AM   Printer-friendly
from the rotating-magnetic-wheel dept.

frojack writes:

"Tesla stock soared today, up over 17% at one point, on solid earnings reports, and also due to achieving the highest recommendation of all cars from Consumer Reports (Note, not linking direct to paywalled CR site). In addition, Tesla Motors Inc. is expected to make a big announcement regarding its 'gigafactory' battery plant this week. Tesla is rumored to be partnering with Japan's Panasonic Corp. or South Korea's Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. The location of the factory is also yet to be determined, although analysts have bet on New Mexico or Arizona. One thing is sure: 'Tesla hopes to reinvent battery production like it already did to other parts of the auto supply chain,' one Wall Street analyst said.

Within the next few weeks, CEO Elon Musk will go to China to deliver the country's first Model S according to CNBC."

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0, Troll) by sudo on Thursday February 27 2014, @05:09AM

    by sudo (647) on Thursday February 27 2014, @05:09AM (#7795)

    This story is trash. TSLA reported earnings last week. Thought /. was where we went for old news?

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   -1  
       Troll=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Troll' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   0  
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by cwix on Thursday February 27 2014, @05:22AM

    by cwix (873) on Thursday February 27 2014, @05:22AM (#7800)

    Backlog of stories and the desire not to push them out to quick is my guess.

    • (Score: 1) by cwix on Thursday February 27 2014, @05:24AM

      by cwix (873) on Thursday February 27 2014, @05:24AM (#7801)

      Sorry this was supposed to be a reply to comment 7795. I mush have clicked the wrong reply button.

      • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 27 2014, @05:32AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 27 2014, @05:32AM (#7804)

        It was a reply to comment 7795.

        • (Score: 0, Redundant) by cwix on Thursday February 27 2014, @12:57PM

          by cwix (873) on Thursday February 27 2014, @12:57PM (#7919)

          Hmm after I posted, it looked like a second commend. Well either way I screwed up lol, Mea culpa.

  • (Score: 2, Interesting) by sigterm on Thursday February 27 2014, @05:58AM

    by sigterm (849) on Thursday February 27 2014, @05:58AM (#7812)

    That's actually a very good question.

    There are several interesting stories on the submissions list, so why aren't we seeing them on the front page? Is SoylentNews still in need of more editors?

    • (Score: 2) by nobbis on Thursday February 27 2014, @06:43AM

      by nobbis (62) on Thursday February 27 2014, @06:43AM (#7825) Homepage Journal

      Agreed, plus we have a dupe on the front page, and a story about xenophobia that is outside the focus of this site

      --
      It's easy to look up when your mind's in the gutter
    • (Score: 2) by gringer on Thursday February 27 2014, @06:50AM

      by gringer (962) on Thursday February 27 2014, @06:50AM (#7827) Homepage

      I don't think it's a lack of editor problem. Look at the time stamps on submissions -- it's a fairly consistent 1.5 hour separation, on the half hour/hour. I would expect less consistency in submission time if editors were a problem.

      --
      Ask me about Sequencing DNA in front of Linus Torvalds [youtube.com]
    • (Score: 3, Interesting) by TheRaven on Thursday February 27 2014, @01:47PM

      by TheRaven (270) on Thursday February 27 2014, @01:47PM (#7942) Journal
      And who is LaminatorX? All of the stories he (or she, or it) has posted on the front page today have been crap. I went to my settings to block him, yet the list of editors I see is:
      • Cactus
      • mattie_p
      • NCommander
      • robind

      So I don't seem to have the option of saying 'LaminatorX is the new kdawson'.

      To avoid this post sounding too negative: Dopefish has managed to fill up the front page with interesting articles. Keep up the good work!

      --
      sudo mod me up
      • (Score: 5, Insightful) by Sir Garlon on Thursday February 27 2014, @02:35PM

        by Sir Garlon (1264) on Thursday February 27 2014, @02:35PM (#7960)

        Stories come from the community. If you want better stories, submit better stories. (I've submitted a couple, and they are not the most outstanding things ever to grace the front page of Soylent. Submitting a good story is not as easy as it sounds, I quickly learned.)

        --
        [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
        • (Score: 2) by TheRaven on Friday February 28 2014, @09:26AM

          by TheRaven (270) on Friday February 28 2014, @09:26AM (#8386) Journal

          Stories come from the community and are filtered by the editors. There are quite a few interesting stories in the submission queue, and yet LaminatorX managed to pick the ones that embodied the worst of Slashdot. Dopefish, in contrast, managed to pick a load of interesting articles from the same queue.

          Given the posting rate of about one story per hour, the problem is not the shortage of submissions, it's poor choices by the editors (or, specifically, by one editor). Looking at the current submission queue, there are 48, and about a quarter of them look like they'd be interesting. That's enough for the next 12 hours, even if nothing else is submitted.

          --
          sudo mod me up
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by Sir Garlon on Thursday February 27 2014, @01:31PM

    by Sir Garlon (1264) on Thursday February 27 2014, @01:31PM (#7936)

    Nope, ./ was where we use to go for flame wars and fanbois. Soylent is not about the fresh news, it's about the discussion. We can discuss a week-old story just fine, thank you very much. I think the editors are doing a great job.

    If you are dissatisfied with the timeliness of the stories, perhaps you'd care to submit a few and help keep us up to date.

    --
    [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.