Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Friday May 24 2019, @11:34AM   Printer-friendly
from the One-man-takes-on-US-Government;-who-will-prevail? dept.

Assange Indicted Under Espionage Act, Raising First Amendment Issues

Julian Assange, the WikiLeaks leader, has been indicted on 17 new counts of violating the Espionage Act for his role in publishing classified military and diplomatic documents in 2010, the Justice Department announced on Thursday — a novel case that raises profound First Amendment issues.

The new charges were part of a superseding indictment obtained by the Trump administration that significantly expanded the legal case against Mr. Assange, who is already fighting extradition proceedings in London based on an earlier hacking-related count brought by federal prosecutors in Northern Virginia.

[...] On its face, the Espionage Act could also be used to prosecute reporters who publish government secrets. But many legal scholars believe that prosecuting people for acts related to receiving and publishing information would violate the First Amendment.

That notion has never been tested in court, however, because until now the government has never brought such charges. The closest it came was indicting two lobbyists for a pro-Israel group in 2005 who received classified information about American policy toward Iran and passed it on. But that case fell apart after several skeptical pretrial rulings by a judge, and the charges were dropped.

Though he is not a conventional journalist, much of what Mr. Assange does at WikiLeaks is difficult to distinguish in a legally meaningful way from what traditional news organizations like The New York Times do: seek and publish information that officials want to be secret, including classified national security matters, and take steps to protect the confidentiality of sources.

Also at BBC, CNBC, USA Today, and Reuters

Previously: Inadvertent Court Filing Suggests that the U.S. DoJ is Preparing to Indict Julian Assange
U.S. Ramping Up Probe Against Julian Assange, WikiLeaks Says
Wikileaks Co-Founder Julian Assange Arrested at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London
Julian Assange Sentenced to 50 Weeks in Prison for Bail Breach
Swedish Prosecutor to Reopen Julian Assange Investigation


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Friday May 24 2019, @04:07PM (4 children)

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Friday May 24 2019, @04:07PM (#847138) Homepage Journal

    What, exactly, in the Mueller report, are you referring to? I actually read the first few pages. I skimmed much of the rest. I found no "smoking gun".

    Even I can be put off by excessive verbiage that ultimately says nothing.

    --
    "no more than 8 bullets in a round" - Joe Biden
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 4, Informative) by DeathMonkey on Friday May 24 2019, @06:07PM (3 children)

    by DeathMonkey (1380) on Friday May 24 2019, @06:07PM (#847243) Journal

    What, exactly, in the Mueller report, are you referring to?

    Ten documented cases of Obstruction of Justice. But you know this already...

    • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Friday May 24 2019, @06:21PM (2 children)

      by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Friday May 24 2019, @06:21PM (#847265) Homepage Journal

      Yeah, whatever. You can call it obstruction of justice - I'll call it obstruction of a bunch of busybodies.

      --
      "no more than 8 bullets in a round" - Joe Biden
      • (Score: 2, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 24 2019, @08:51PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 24 2019, @08:51PM (#847351)

        Then your argument is a complete load of nonsense.

        Obstruction is a legal term with a legal definition.

        What YOU have is an opinion, and an uninformed one at that. And they are worthless.

        But don't worry. You are protected by your 'I can never be wrong' bubble so its all good.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 24 2019, @10:38PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 24 2019, @10:38PM (#847389)

        lol getting reaaaal dumb these days runaway