I voted China, but just to play devil's advocate let's look at what
might hold them back. First, they might care more about terrestrial
military might. They're working on aircraft carriers to compete with
the USA, and they're showing imperialist action on the seas. Imperialism
is expensive. Second, they rely on trade to drive their economic engine
and Trump is working to dismantle that trade. Third, "it's been done".
They might prefer to push for Mars instead. Fourth, they might just
do some analysis and decide that while a "prestige" shot is possible, they
can't justify an ongoing presence at this time. They can be very practical
as evidenced by their "communism" that is about as far from communism
as you can get.
-- Appended to the end of comments you post. Max: 120 chars.
(Score: 2) by istartedi on Friday June 21 2019, @10:58PM
I voted China, but just to play devil's advocate let's look at what might hold them back. First, they might care more about terrestrial military might. They're working on aircraft carriers to compete with the USA, and they're showing imperialist action on the seas. Imperialism is expensive. Second, they rely on trade to drive their economic engine and Trump is working to dismantle that trade. Third, "it's been done". They might prefer to push for Mars instead. Fourth, they might just do some analysis and decide that while a "prestige" shot is possible, they can't justify an ongoing presence at this time. They can be very practical as evidenced by their "communism" that is about as far from communism as you can get.
Appended to the end of comments you post. Max: 120 chars.