Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Thursday June 06 2019, @12:39AM   Printer-friendly
from the "The-Graduate" dept.

Bloomberg:

As the world strives to wean itself off fossil fuels, oil companies have been turning to plastic as the key to their future. Now even that's looking overly optimistic.

The global crackdown on plastic trash threatens to take a big chunk out of demand growth just as oil companies like Saudi Aramco sink billions into plastic and chemicals assets. Royal Dutch Shell Plc, BP Plc, Total SA and Exxon Mobil Corp. are all ramping up investments in the sector.

Renewed emphasis on recycling and the spread of local bans on some kinds of plastic products could cut petrochemical demand growth to one-third of its historical pace, to about 1.5% a year, said Paul Bjacek, a principal director at consulting firm Accenture Plc.

Maybe they can convince consumers to accept clamshell packaging for everything.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by PartTimeZombie on Thursday June 06 2019, @01:44AM (7 children)

    by PartTimeZombie (4827) on Thursday June 06 2019, @01:44AM (#852011)

    Yeah,

    ...take a big chunk out of demand growth...

    as if growth can continue for ever.

    Anyway, if the Saudi royal family wind up broke the world will be a better place. Not that they will, when they run out of oil they will just go and live in their Mayfair mansions.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Thursday June 06 2019, @10:36AM (6 children)

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Thursday June 06 2019, @10:36AM (#852155) Journal

    Anyway, if the Saudi royal family wind up broke the world will be a better place.

    Unless, of course, that comes at the expense of the well being of many other people. Policies that harm one person need not help another.

    • (Score: 1) by fustakrakich on Thursday June 06 2019, @03:05PM (2 children)

      by fustakrakich (6150) on Thursday June 06 2019, @03:05PM (#852261) Journal

      You only have to check the usual cost/benefit ratio. All you need is a pocket calculator.

      --
      La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
      • (Score: 1) by khallow on Friday June 07 2019, @09:51PM (1 child)

        by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Friday June 07 2019, @09:51PM (#852857) Journal

        You only have to check the usual cost/benefit ratio.

        I recall the cost/benefit ratio supposedly wasn't exciting for other examples of regime change.

        • (Score: 1) by fustakrakich on Saturday June 08 2019, @12:35AM

          by fustakrakich (6150) on Saturday June 08 2019, @12:35AM (#852913) Journal

          Wouldn't know about "exciting". It is merely the primary method of deciding whether to invade or not. It's like the riot index, you balance the "benefits" of austerity to the costs of the resulting property damage. Everything is done by the numbers. Perfectly natural and normal.

          --
          La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
    • (Score: 2) by PartTimeZombie on Thursday June 06 2019, @09:12PM (2 children)

      by PartTimeZombie (4827) on Thursday June 06 2019, @09:12PM (#852440)

      Policies that remove power from the House of Saud are likely to be a net benefit for everyone involved.

      I don't see why anyone should have to live under an absolute monarch in 2019.

      • (Score: 1) by khallow on Friday June 07 2019, @01:53PM (1 child)

        by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Friday June 07 2019, @01:53PM (#852675) Journal

        Policies that remove power from the House of Saud are likely to be a net benefit for everyone involved.

        I see policies that removed (or could remove) bad people from power heavily criticized before - such as supporting the Arab Spring, invasion of Iraq which removed Saddam Hussein from power, the current sanctions against Iran, and current support for Venezuela opposition. I don't buy that there's likely to be a net benefit in that light.

        • (Score: 2) by PartTimeZombie on Saturday June 08 2019, @07:54AM

          by PartTimeZombie (4827) on Saturday June 08 2019, @07:54AM (#853033)

          ....the Arab Spring, invasion of Iraq which removed Saddam Hussein from power, the current sanctions against Iran, and current support for Venezuela opposition.

          You're right, when the US meddles they always screw things up.