Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Thursday June 06 2019, @12:39AM   Printer-friendly
from the "The-Graduate" dept.

Bloomberg:

As the world strives to wean itself off fossil fuels, oil companies have been turning to plastic as the key to their future. Now even that's looking overly optimistic.

The global crackdown on plastic trash threatens to take a big chunk out of demand growth just as oil companies like Saudi Aramco sink billions into plastic and chemicals assets. Royal Dutch Shell Plc, BP Plc, Total SA and Exxon Mobil Corp. are all ramping up investments in the sector.

Renewed emphasis on recycling and the spread of local bans on some kinds of plastic products could cut petrochemical demand growth to one-third of its historical pace, to about 1.5% a year, said Paul Bjacek, a principal director at consulting firm Accenture Plc.

Maybe they can convince consumers to accept clamshell packaging for everything.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 06 2019, @09:19AM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 06 2019, @09:19AM (#852140)

    Because it appears that economics is telling us that plastic is fine.

    Economics also tells us that slavery is fine: Slave traders did make profits, or else they would have stopped that trade without being forced to by law. I hope you agree that slavery is not fine.

    Economics is not the answer to everything.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +2  
       Insightful=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0, Troll) by khallow on Thursday June 06 2019, @10:33AM

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Thursday June 06 2019, @10:33AM (#852154) Journal

    Slave traders did make profits, or else they would have stopped that trade without being forced to by law.

    Given that law forced slaves to be slaves in the first place, what point are you really making?

    I'd say rather that the economic success of free societies over those of slave societies (such as the Communist and Fascist societies of the 20th century) indicates that economics came to a different decision than you thought.