Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Sunday June 09 2019, @03:19AM   Printer-friendly
from the Trying-to-MAKE:-a-go-of-things dept.

"Maker Media Inc ceased operations this week and let go of all of its employees — about 22 employees" founder and CEO Dale Dougherty told TechCrunch. "I started this 15 years ago and it's always been a struggle as a business to make this work. Print publishing is not a great business for anybody, but it works...barely. Events are hard . . . there was a drop off in corporate sponsorship." Microsoft and Autodesk failed to sponsor this year's flagship Bay Area Maker Faire.

But Dougherty is still desperately trying to resuscitate the company in some capacity, if only to keep MAKE:'s online archive running and continue allowing third-party organizers to license the Maker Faire name to throw affiliated events. Rather than bankruptcy, Maker Media is working through an alternative Assignment for Benefit of Creditors process.

"We're trying to keep the servers running" Dougherty tells me. "I hope to be able to get control of the assets of the company and restart it. We're not necessarily going to do everything we did in the past but I'm committed to keeping the print magazine going and the Maker Faire licensing program." The fate of those hopes will depend on negotiations with banks and financiers over the next few weeks. For now the sites remain online.

LINK:
https://techcrunch.com/2019/06/07/make-magazine-maker-media-layoffs/


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Monday June 10 2019, @06:42AM

    Do you have any evidence that they were particularly "woke" (why are you letting this historical ignorance of simple grammar infect your language?)?
    https://makermedia.com/our-team/ looks to me more white if anything than one might expect an unbiased cross-section of the US might be. Females may be well represented, but they mostly are in roles that traditionally have good female representation - customer/media/partner relations, art/marketting, etc.. The website seems to engage in no pandering to any named minorities, nor even to mention that the concepts of minorities are even important to them.

    Your "get woke go broke" riff in this context seems like nothing but a shit-stirring troll.
    --
    Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2