Submitted via IRC for Bytram
Tiny houses entice budget-conscious Americans (AFP)
In a country that nearly always believes bigger is better—think supersize fries, giant cars and 10-gallon hats—more and more Americans are downsizing their living quarters. Welcome to the world of tiny homes, most of them less than 400 square feet (less than 40 square meters), which savvy buyers are snapping up for their minimalist appeal and much smaller carbon footprints. The tiny homes revolution, which includes those on foundations and those on wheels, began a few decades ago, but the financial crisis of 2008 and the coming-of-age of millennials gave it a new impetus. The proliferation of home improvement shows on networks like HGTV fueled the trend, inspiring customers ready to personalize their own small living spaces.
Cost is one of the driving factors—a tiny home of just over 200 square feet with a customized interior can go for about $50,000—a massive savings over a McMansion in the suburbs.
[...] Despite the advantages, the tiny homes movement is far from widespread. Rough estimates put the number of tiny homes in the United States at a little more than 10,000. The first sticking point is financing—would-be homeowners are finding it impossible to get traditional loans for non-traditional houses. Banks are instead offering medium-term loans of up to seven years—at significantly higher interest rates than regular loans. But the main obstacle is a legal one: most municipalities and towns ban residents from living year-round in anything on wheels, and often have statutes requiring homes to be at least 900 square feet.
[...] To vault over the many legal hurdles, many tiny home buyers are setting up their places without permits from local urban planning officials. But others are opting for tiny house communities, which are on solid legal footing and are sprouting up all over. Tiny Estates in Elizabethtown, Pennsylvania took over a former campground and obtained the necessary permits to accommodate tiny homes on wheels. "It's important to go to your town meetings, your borough meetings and just say, 'Hey, here's what they are'," says Berrier. "It's not some clandestine little sketchy thing. These are beautiful tiny houses, well designed. If anything, they add property value to things."
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 20 2019, @03:26PM (1 child)
I understand that getting ahead today can seem nearly impossible, and McMansions are an aberration of a different time. But at least here there's a ton of mid-20th century housing stock around.
They are affordable ones for lower middle class incomes and above that are worth their money. About the "carbon footprint", I guess that's virtue signaling speak for energy efficiency, there's a bunch of options that could make sense in a place you're planning to stay for at least five years. Incidental ones, like replacing incandescents with LEDs, to durable ones, like replacing a 30 year old furnace when it dies.
As an AC, I don't need to virtue signal, so I can say that I bought my large for this area 2000 sq ft 3 BR house primarily because of the expected liquidity of the market, should I want to sell. Energy efficiency is something I consider, but amortization periods would have to be commensurate.
(Score: 2) by captain normal on Thursday June 20 2019, @07:19PM
Obviously you don't live in central or southern California.
"It is easier to fool someone than it is to convince them that they have been fooled" Mark Twain