Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Saturday June 29 2019, @07:37PM   Printer-friendly
from the 95%-success dept.

SpaceX's Starlink program launched an initial sixty satellites on May 23. At least three of these "are no longer in service" and "will passively deorbit." according to a spokesperson for the company.

In other words, the three spacecraft failed and will fall back to Earth, likely within a year because of their relatively low orbit of 273 miles (440 kilometers) above the planet's surface.

SpaceX seems relatively unfazed by the failures, though, since the company never expected all of them to function perfectly given the mission's experimental nature.

SpaceX intentionally implemented the satellites with minor variations.

On a brighter note, 45 of the satellites, which are equipped with small ion engines for maneuvering, have already reached their intended orbits. Five are moving towards their orbits, and five are pending evaluation before maneuvering. Another "[t]wo satellites are being intentionally deorbited to simulate an end of life disposal."

[N]ow that the majority of the satellites have reached their operational altitude, SpaceX will begin using the constellation to start transmitting broadband signals, testing the latency and capacity by streaming videos and playing some high bandwidth video games using gateways throughout North America.

The Starlink program was stung by early comments that the program was negatively affecting astronomy and SpaceX

added that it "continues to monitor the visibility of the satellites as they approach their final orbit" and that they will be measured for their visibility from the ground once there. Those comments are likely meant to address concerns lodged by astronomers about the reflectivity of Starlink spacecraft

The satellites are designed to completely disintegrate upon entering Earth's atmosphere, and the failures may help drive future iterations.

Previous Coverage
Most of SpaceX's Starlink Internet Satellites are Already on Track
SpaceX Satellites Pose New Headache for Astronomers
Third Time's the Charm! SpaceX Launch Good; Starlink Satellite Deployment Coming Up [Updated]
SpaceX to Launch 60 Starlink Satellites: Postponed 1 Day Due to Upper Altitude Winds [UPDATE 2]
SpaceX to Launch 60 Starlink Satellites at Once, and More
SpaceX's First Dedicated Starlink Launch Set for May; Amazon Hired SpaceX Execs for Project Kuiper


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Interesting) by RandomFactor on Saturday June 29 2019, @07:47PM (2 children)

    by RandomFactor (3682) Subscriber Badge on Saturday June 29 2019, @07:47PM (#861411) Journal

    they can't use the three that died for their reentry tests :-(

    --
    В «Правде» нет известий, в «Известиях» нет правды
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by looorg on Saturday June 29 2019, @10:00PM (1 child)

    by looorg (578) on Saturday June 29 2019, @10:00PM (#861437)

    This is what I was wondering to after reading it, why not just reclassify the failed once for reentry testing? Or was they somehow specially belt with extra "crash and burn" sensors the others doesn't have?

    • (Score: 2) by NateMich on Saturday June 29 2019, @10:24PM

      by NateMich (6662) on Saturday June 29 2019, @10:24PM (#861446)

      This is what I was wondering to after reading it, why not just reclassify the failed once for reentry testing? Or was they somehow specially belt with extra "crash and burn" sensors the others doesn't have?

      Based on the summary, it sounds like the failed ones are just plain broken. That would make it really hard to simulate a controlled reentry.