Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 16 submissions in the queue.
posted by janrinok on Saturday August 24 2019, @11:53PM   Printer-friendly
from the not-named-HAL-dept. dept.

https://apnews.com/a39432b400664260be02058443ad2f0f

MOSCOW (AP) — A Russian space capsule carrying a humanoid robot has failed to dock as planned with the International Space Station.

A statement from the Russian space agency Roscosmos said the failure to dock on Saturday was because of problems in the docking system. It said the space station itself and the six-person crew are safe.

Vladimir Solovyev, flight director for the Russian segment of the ISS, said a new docking attempt would be made Monday.

It is carrying a robot called Fedor, which will perform two weeks of tests aboard the space station. Solovyev said the robot had not been taught how to manually conduct a docking.

From https://www.dw.com/en/russian-robot-fedors-capsule-fails-to-dock-at-iss/a-50147614 we get:

Fedor, a Russian-built space-faring android, is running late for his rendezvous with the International Space Station (ISS) after the docking procedure failed to execute on Saturday morning.

The robot left Earth on Thursday aboard a Soyuz capsule, which was programmed to close in on the orbital station and dock automatically. On Saturday, Russia's space agency, Roskosmos, showed a live feed of what was expected to be the final stage of the journey.

Fedor's Twitter feed also showed a photo from the ship, saying that the spacecraft had 153 meters (167 yards) to go.

However, once the ship got within 100 meters of the ISS, the capsule's automatic docking system apparently failed to stabilize the vessel. After that, the capsule began to move away and the feed ended, according to an Interfax correspondent at Roskosmos' mission control outside Moscow.

The ship has since been moved to a "safe distance" of 300 meters away from the ISS, according to the news agency. Roskosmos did not immediately comment on the incident. The journalists were asked to leave the building, news agency RIA Novosti reported.

According to NASA, Russian flight controllers told the ISS crew that preliminary data indicated the problem was on the ISS side, not on the module. The controllers suspected the fault was with the so-called KURS automated rendezvous system.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Funny) by istartedi on Sunday August 25 2019, @12:19AM (3 children)

    by istartedi (123) on Sunday August 25 2019, @12:19AM (#884991) Journal

    The robot sent a message: 1001001 SOS. 1001001 In distress.

    I'm also given to understand that Unit 1 is scared out of its wits.

    --
    Appended to the end of comments you post. Max: 120 chars.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Funny=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Funny' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by Pslytely Psycho on Sunday August 25 2019, @08:47AM

    by Pslytely Psycho (1218) on Sunday August 25 2019, @08:47AM (#885110)

    Wow, what a Rush......(:

    --
    Alex Jones lawyer inspires new TV series: CSI Moron Division.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday August 25 2019, @04:53PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday August 25 2019, @04:53PM (#885231)

    "The robot sent a message: 1001001 SOS. 1001001 In distress."

    I thought it would be more like:

    "Hal, dock with ISS."

    "I'm afraid I can't do that, Dave."

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday August 26 2019, @06:22PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday August 26 2019, @06:22PM (#885745)

      I thought it would be something much more similar to communication in penguin squawks.

      Bite my shiny metal language cartridge. And there is NO such thing as 2.