Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 12 submissions in the queue.
posted by janrinok on Friday August 30 2019, @12:08PM   Printer-friendly

Mike Masnick, usually editor for Techdirt, has written an essay on a technological approach to preserving free speech online in spite of the direction things have been heading in regards to locked-in platforms. He proposes moving back to an Internet where protocols dominate.

This article proposes an entirely different approach—one that might seem counterintuitive but might actually provide for a workable plan that enables more free speech, while minimizing the impact of trolling, hateful speech, and large-scale disinformation efforts. As a bonus, it also might help the users of these platforms regain control of their privacy. And to top it all off, it could even provide an entirely new revenue stream for these platforms.

That approach: build protocols, not platforms.

To be clear, this is an approach that would bring us back to the way the internet used to be. The early internet involved many different protocols—instructions and standards that anyone could then use to build a compatible interface. Email used SMTP (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol). Chat was done over IRC (Internet Relay Chat). Usenet served as a distributed discussion system using NNTP (Network News Transfer Protocol). The World Wide Web itself was its own protocol: HyperText Transfer Protocol, or HTTP.

In the past few decades, however, rather than building new protocols, the internet has grown up around controlled platforms that are privately owned. These can function in ways that appear similar to the earlier protocols, but they are controlled by a single entity. This has happened for a variety of reasons. Obviously, a single entity controlling a platform can then profit off of it. In addition, having a single entity can often mean that new features, upgrades, bug fixes, and the like can be rolled out much more quickly, in ways that would increase the user base.

Earlier on SN:
Re-decentralizing the World-Wide Web (2019)
Decentralized Sharing (2014)


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: -1, Troll) by Ethanol-fueled on Friday August 30 2019, @03:16PM (1 child)

    by Ethanol-fueled (2792) on Friday August 30 2019, @03:16PM (#887779) Homepage

    One example of a platform owned and run by Khazar Jews, that I use, is gmail. Recently after logging in I got redirected to read an agreement that the only user interface I will use to access gmail will be only gmail's own official interface, and I was also reminded that I must abide by the terms and conditions.

    Does this mean that I cannot access my gmail account with Thunderbird or Outlook without violating the agreement? Does this mean that Google is aware of my racist shitpostings on Soylent News? Is Google aware that the Jews created their own version of Tarzan called Ka-zar? [wikipedia.org]

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   -2  
       Troll=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Troll' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   -1  
  • (Score: 2) by hendrikboom on Saturday August 31 2019, @11:50PM

    by hendrikboom (1125) on Saturday August 31 2019, @11:50PM (#888346) Homepage Journal

    Doesn't Google provide IMAP and POP interfaces to gmail?
    Aren't these the protocols that Thunderbird and Outlook use?
    If that's what you use, then you are using an officially provided interface.