[Seconding-Ed note: This story is likely to be contentious. In the interests of helping set the tone, I would like to start off by quoting H.L. Mencken:
The trouble with fighting for human freedom is that one spends most of one's time defending scoundrels. For it is against scoundrels that oppressive laws are first aimed, and oppression must be stopped at the beginning if it is to be stopped at all.
Further, this quote which has appeared in various phrasings and attributions:
I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.
To mind's eye, I must be willing to accept against my own words and actions any that I would wish to see imposed upon another. --martyb]
Arthur T Knackerbracket has found the following story:
The channels of two prominent far-right YouTubers have been re-instated after the video-sharing site said it made a mistake in removing them. Initially, YouTube gave no reason for changing its decision and just said it had made a "wrong call". Later, it said that while many people found the channels "deeply offensive", they had not broken its rules. The decision came days after YouTube's chief executive said YouTube had to be open to hosting "controversial" ideas.
YouTube removed several channels and accounts this week, claiming they had broken its hate speech policies. Among them was a channel run by white nationalist Martin Sellner and an anonymous British YouTuber known as The Iconoclast. Mr Sellner was reportedly in contact with the man who allegedly carried out the Christchurch mosque shootings in March this year that killed 51 people. Austrian police are investigating his links to the attack. He denies any involvement in the shooting.
Both men protested about the closure of their YouTube channels on social media. They shared information sent to them from YouTube, which said they had "repeatedly" broken its guidelines. On Thursday, YouTube reversed its decision and reinstated the two channels. Several other far-right channels that YouTube banned this week remain unavailable.
An explanation for the change of heart came on Friday. Farshad Shadloo, YouTube's global product policy communications lead, said that after a "thorough review" it had decided that the channels had not broken its rules. "We realise that many may find the viewpoints expressed in these channels deeply offensive," he said. Mr Shadloo added that YouTube had recently updated the way it handled "hateful content".
Earlier this week YouTube boss Susan Wojcicki wrote in a letter to video-makers that YouTube must remain an "open platform". She said the desire to welcome all kinds of views had to be balanced against a "responsibility to protect the community".
"A commitment to openness is not easy. It sometimes means leaving up content that is outside the mainstream, controversial or even offensive," she said. "Hearing a broad range of perspectives ultimately makes us a stronger and more informed society," she claimed.
The U.S. attorney for the Northern District of Ohio on Thursday announced new federal charges against a self-avowed white nationalist accused of threatening to commit an attack on a local Jewish community center. James Reardon, who attended the 2017 Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, was arrested last week after authorities said he posted the threat on Instagram. U.S. Attorney Justin Herdman said Reardon has now been charged with one count of making threats as authorities continue their investigation into Reardon and whether he my have any accomplices.
Of course, not so much that, but what Herdman said after that.
"I am talking directly to you," Herdman said at a news conference announcing the charges. "The Constitution protects your right to speak, your right to think, and your right to believe. If you want to waste the blessings of liberty by going down a path of hatred and failed ideologies, that is your choice."
Herdman continued, evoking the sacrifices made by U.S. service members in World War II against Nazism, as well as those who marched for civil rights throughout U.S. history.
"Thousands and thousands of young Americans already voted with their lives to ensure that this same message of intolerance, death, and destruction would not prevail - you can count their ballots by visiting any American cemetery in North Africa, Italy, France, or Belgium and tallying the white headstones," Herdman said. "You can also recite the many names of civil rights advocates who bled and died in opposing supporters of those same ideologies of hatred. Their voices may be distant, but they can still be heard."
"The Constitution may give you a voice, but it doesn't guarantee you a receptive audience," Herdman added.
(Score: 2) by Azuma Hazuki on Sunday September 01 2019, @10:34PM (4 children)
So what I'm reading from this is you don't want to be bothered and you think you can stay neutral in times of crisis. God, what a waste of oxygen you are.
Fuck you sideways, twice, in the ass, for assuming my "solution" to this is censorship or curtailing peoples' freedom of speech. No, asswipe, my solution to this is using that intellect and knowledge you mentioned to post counter-points...but I'm sick and fucking tired of doing it alone, with no help, while you sit there with your thumb up your holier-than-thou ass and pretend your lazy, morally-bankrupt "neutrality" is winning you any boy scout badges.
And you call ME arrogant. Jesus fuck. Well, don't say I didn't warn you. I'm going to keep fighting the good fight, even if I am surrounded by worthless no-ops like you. You may as well step down from your editorial position since you're doing somewhere between shit and jack shit with it.
I am "that girl" your mother warned you about...
(Score: 2) by janrinok on Monday September 02 2019, @06:35AM (3 children)
This is precisely why I do not make comments in your support. You are incapable of holding a calm and intelligent conversation. You bring it back to insults and invective. You might have a valid point to make, but you destroy it yourself by being unable to remain a rational individual. I hope that you find a site that you like, where everybody either agrees with you or is so intimidated by your childish displays of anger that they dare not respond.
If you read my other comments you will see that I am very much against the views of the alt-right, or of those who do not show tolerance to anyone who hasn't got the same colour of skin or believe in the same God. I am against extremism in any shape or form. That doesn't mean I should be arguing to prevent them from expressing themselves. You do understand what your own Constitution says and means, don't you? If not, go to the top of the story and start by re-reading TFS again.
(Score: 2) by Azuma Hazuki on Monday September 02 2019, @07:51PM (2 children)
The First Amendment says that government may not abridge free speech, free press, and free expression of religion. This does not mean you may shout fire in a crowded theater, at least not without other consequences not directly infringing on speech itself.
And you know what? Fuck you sideways a third time for your thin-skinned tone-trolling bullshit. You just admitted to me you'd rather let memetic plague carriers run rampant all over your site than give even the *appearance* of working with me against them because you don't like my attitude. Shit like this from people like you is *why* I have that attitude. This is your own fault. Maybe do some self-reflection instead of having a self-righteous attack of the vapors?
Or don't, whatever. I knew from the start you can't be counted on to do anything helpful, so just keep on being a gormless, useful idiot.
I am "that girl" your mother warned you about...
(Score: 2) by janrinok on Tuesday September 03 2019, @02:37AM (1 child)
I can always tell when you are losing an argument - you become abusive.
The trolls can tell as well.
(Score: 2) by Azuma Hazuki on Wednesday September 04 2019, @12:23AM
Oh, I'm sorry, but this is Abuse. Yes, you want Room 12A, next door. ... ... ...stupid git.
I am "that girl" your mother warned you about...