Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Informative) by SMI on Friday February 28 2014, @02:56AM

    by SMI (333) on Friday February 28 2014, @02:56AM (#8227)

    See this [soylentnews.org] thread. I'm sure it's still possible, eventually.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Insightful=1, Informative=1, Total=2
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 2) by clone141166 on Friday February 28 2014, @03:04AM

    by clone141166 (59) on Friday February 28 2014, @03:04AM (#8231)

    Thanks SMI, I didn't realise there were technical limitations behind supporting multiple colour schemes simultaneously.

    • (Score: 5, Informative) by lgsoynews on Friday February 28 2014, @02:06PM

      by lgsoynews (1235) on Friday February 28 2014, @02:06PM (#8496)

      I think the easiest way is to modify your style-sheet. For a basic example, using the extension "Stylish" in Firefox, I added that :

          .commentTop .title h4 {    background-color: blue ; }

      The result: an ugly blue for the comment titles (tested on the current page).

      I'm a heavy user of Stylish, and -to a smaller extent- Greasemonkey. In some cases, I've almost completely modified the UI of some tools (Redmine for instance), to make them more usable. It's amazing what one can do with those tools. I modified Redmine so heavily that my colleagues did not recognize it at once. For instance, I added small icons for each of the people who worked with me (using inline -base64- images).

      The only pb is that the site must use CSS in a clever way. Some sites don't and it's painful to change elements, sometimes you have to use the full access path, ouch! And when anything changes in the CSS, agh!

      BTW this is how I minimized the pain of the Beta version of a site that shall remain nameless :-)

      Given that most (all) people here are quite technical, this could be an efficient intermediate solution. We could even have an area with the schemes downloadable as CSS user-styles...

      • (Score: 2) by SMI on Friday February 28 2014, @08:17PM

        by SMI (333) on Friday February 28 2014, @08:17PM (#8740)

        Thank you very much, you introduced me to the solution that I was looking for. Instead of changing SN itself, we should change the way that our browsers display it. That gives everyone the theme-ability without any legal complications for SN. After reading your comment and poking around a bit, I'm now using Stylish [mozilla.org] with one [userstyles.org] of the color schemes available on userstyles.org [userstyles.org].

        • (Score: 1) by Ryuugami on Monday March 03 2014, @08:14AM

          by Ryuugami (2925) on Monday March 03 2014, @08:14AM (#9947)

          Thank you for that color scheme link, I was thinking of writing a style myself, but didn't yet get around to it.

          Seems to require a few tweaks (from my POV, green on red is NOT a good combination for a title - or almost anywhere, for that matter), but it's a decent starting point.

          As for the poll, I voted green - with a name like "Soylent", it seemed natural. With the Other Site switching over to white, soon enough there wouldn't be any confusion anyway :) Though a different shade would probably be a good idea.

          --
          If a shit storm's on the horizon, it's good to know far enough ahead you can at least bring along an umbrella. - D.Weber
      • (Score: 1) by FakeBeldin on Saturday March 01 2014, @02:37PM

        by FakeBeldin (3360) on Saturday March 01 2014, @02:37PM (#9124) Journal

        I just tried in Firefox (inspect element), setting background-color to #004488;
        That's starting to look in a direction I'd like even better than the current red. (Yes I voted blue ;-)

        • (Score: 2) by maxwell demon on Sunday March 02 2014, @10:40AM

          by maxwell demon (1608) on Sunday March 02 2014, @10:40AM (#9494) Journal

          I just tried it and found I don't like that blue ;-) However playing a bit with the colours I found #aa9933 gives a nice green which is far enough from the Slashdot green that I doubt it would generate any trademark problems.

          --
          The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
          • (Score: 1) by FakeBeldin on Wednesday March 05 2014, @01:27PM

            by FakeBeldin (3360) on Wednesday March 05 2014, @01:27PM (#11309) Journal

            I tried your color, and I'm pretty sure our monitors happen to fall on different ends of the calibration spectrum.
            Which indicates a problem: how to pick a color that looks acceptable on most default-calibrated monitors?

            (For simplicity's sake, we can reduce it to "looking acceptable on both Maxwell demon's monitor and on FakeBeldin's monitor)

  • (Score: 2) by mcgrew on Friday February 28 2014, @12:41PM

    by mcgrew (701) <publish@mcgrewbooks.com> on Friday February 28 2014, @12:41PM (#8447) Homepage Journal

    I guess I'd have to look at the underlying code, but couldn't there be a variable chosen by the user, held in a cookie, that would point to the right stylesheet? Why would it need separate instances of Apache?

    --
    mcgrewbooks.com mcgrew.info nooze.org
    • (Score: 2) by Khyber on Sunday March 02 2014, @04:05AM

      by Khyber (54) on Sunday March 02 2014, @04:05AM (#9384) Journal

      What cluster-fuckery is it that one can't just put a simple hexadecimal color identifier in their preferences section?

      If you need to spawn multiple instances of Apache to handle something so basic and fucking trivial, that section of code needs to be abandoned ENTIRELY.

      --
      Destroying Semiconductors With Style Since 2008, and scaring you ill-educated fools since 2013.
      • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Sunday March 02 2014, @02:45PM

        by FatPhil (863) <{pc-soylent} {at} {asdf.fi}> on Sunday March 02 2014, @02:45PM (#9616) Homepage
        That would probably be the entire code base - have you peeked within?

        Perhaps |. had the right idea - slashcode was the one which was designed to throw away.
        --
        Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves