Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Thursday August 14 2014, @11:47AM   Printer-friendly
from the one-for-the-little-guy dept.

The latest from the "lawyer-eat-lawyer" dept. from Medium.com:

Law Students Fend Off a Patent Troll.

Free legal support drastically changes a patent troll's calculus. They win by offering to settle cases for less than the cost of the legal defense. It's much cheaper for defendants to pay a troll $50,000 to settle a lawsuit than to pay lawyers $200,000 to win it. However, when a law school clinic is involved, the cost of legal defense drops to zero, and defendants have no incentive to pay trolls anything at all. With a free legal and a winning defense, who wouldn't fight all the way to trial? [...] Running a patent litigation defense clinic is not easy, but its possible, and its a worthwhile project. Patent trolls hurt innovation, and law students can help stop them.

This is a pleasant idea — the law students get practical experience; and the Patent troll gets to deal with a free defense against the claim. A real win for everyone.

Has anyone else seen a local law school pick up these kind of cases?

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by Lagg on Thursday August 14 2014, @12:12PM

    by Lagg (105) on Thursday August 14 2014, @12:12PM (#81203) Homepage Journal

    I've never seen something like this occur until now but looking past the rather mild victory of fending them off (which really doesn't matter in the long run unless you break their bank) it's a pretty neat prospect. In the majority of these cases it seems like the troll's claim can be easily defeated and possibly even their patent being invalidated if only there was someone with decent knowledge and ability to read the legalese involved. I think a law student could satisfy that criteria if they're worth their salt and as the summary/article says it'd sure beat the hell out of a standard internship. I mean I'm no lawyer but surely having a long list of victories on one's resume fresh out of school can only lead to good things. Now if only it would spread and become something regularly offered. Those mild victories could quickly turn into death by a thousand cuts for these asshats.

    --
    http://lagg.me [lagg.me] 🗿
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by carguy on Thursday August 14 2014, @01:24PM

    by carguy (568) Subscriber Badge on Thursday August 14 2014, @01:24PM (#81227)

    At MIT they have a very successful Undergraduate Research Opportunities Program (UROP), matching undergrads with researchers (profs, etc, typically with PhD). The undergrads often produce useful/original research results.

    Perhaps this would be a good model for a law school -- matching law students up as helpers for faculty (practicing lawyers) who guide the case?

    • (Score: 1) by Wootery on Thursday August 14 2014, @05:24PM

      by Wootery (2341) on Thursday August 14 2014, @05:24PM (#81341)

      matching law students up as helpers for faculty (practicing lawyers) who guide the case?

      I doubt it. The point here as I understand it is that the law students were not really working as mere interns. What they got out of it was their own real-world legal success to put on their CV. If you start involving practicing lawyers, you've just got an internship in which you're asking practising lawyers to work pro bono. That's not really what this is about. In this case, the students managed it just about on their own. (That is at least the impression the article gives. The real difference between being an intern and doing work with the BLIP Clinic, I don't know.)