Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

The Fine print: The following are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

We were able to lock up John Mitchell

Journal by fustakrakich

Here's hoping Bill Barr meets the same fate, at the very least... We have them for obstruction. Expect some sweet plea deals...

And for the umpteenth time, "I am NOT running!"

Edit:

Here's another one that should have been locked up already. What's the hold up?

We were able to lock up John Mitchell | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 67 comments | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Reply to Comment Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

  • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday October 09 2019, @12:53PM (4 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday October 09 2019, @12:53PM (#904683)

    Way to cherry pick. Did you need to have the emphasis added stuff to figure out what CNS News (a right-wing spin factory) wants you to think?

    What Clapper said (from the link *you* provided) was:

    Clapper, a strong critic of Trump, replied, "Well, I uh, I don’t know. I, I don’t think there was any wrongdoing. I think at the time all of us were trying to navigate a very, very difficult, politically fraught, highly charged situation. I know, for my part, my main concern was the Russians, and the threat posed by the Russians to our very political fabric.

    "The message I’m getting from all this is apparently what we were supposed to have done was to ignore the Russian interference, ignore the Russian meddling and the threat that it poses to us, and oh, by the way, blown off what the then commander-in-chief, President Obama, told us to do, which was to assemble all the reporting that we could, that we had available to us -- and put it in one report that the president could pass on to the Congress and to the next administration. And while we’re at it, declassify as much as we possibly could to make it public, and that’s what we did."

    [Emphasis added by me this time]
    Hmm...that's adds a little more clarity. Why didn't you include this part? Perhaps because it tosses your bullshit "whataboutism" out the window. Perhaps you should be defenestrated too?

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +1  
       Informative=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Total Score:   1  

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday October 09 2019, @03:22PM (3 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday October 09 2019, @03:22PM (#904751)

    I included the source, unlike anyone else in this thread. If you are too dumb to read between the lines and spin that is not my problem. This is the first time it was claimed by anyone that obama was involved in this fake investigation. Doesn't that seem odd to you?