Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

The Fine print: The following are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

Journal by fustakrakich

My discomfort in the last few years, first with Russiagate and now with Ukrainegate and impeachment, stems from the belief that the people pushing hardest for Trump’s early removal are more dangerous than Trump. Many Americans don’t see this because they’re not used to waking up in a country where you’re not sure who the president will be by nightfall. They don’t understand that this predicament is worse than having a bad president.

[emph mine]

Here's looking at you, DNC!

When is she going to announce?

Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Reply to Comment Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Monday October 14 2019, @03:33PM (24 children)

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Monday October 14 2019, @03:33PM (#906969) Journal

    what could possibly be worse than Trump's treason destroying US credibility

    Well, obviously someone fabricating said evidence of treason merely to get rid of Trump. And right now, accusations of treason are merely trash talk from an AC on the internet. They have no meaning unless we actually find genuine evidence that Trump has committed treason, which let me add has the precondition that he actually committed treason in the first place.

    We have either a foreign agent or a complete moron in office and you think the optics would be bad to remove him?

    So you grant that your certainty is misplaced, even if your imaginary evidence were real, namely, Trump could be a complete moron, whatever that means in the real world.

    I can't fucking even

    Yes.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 14 2019, @04:12PM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 14 2019, @04:12PM (#906992)

    I wasn't talking to you numbnuts, you have proven many times you don't give a shit about facts and evidence. Interesting how the only defense you have left is trying to make people believe that everything is fabricated nonsense. Says a lot about you and your beliefs.

  • (Score: 4, Informative) by https on Monday October 14 2019, @04:13PM (20 children)

    by https (5248) on Monday October 14 2019, @04:13PM (#906993) Journal

    Accusations of treason are from multiple White House staff.

    Come back when you're ready to play.

    --
    Offended and laughing about it.
    • (Score: 1) by khallow on Monday October 14 2019, @04:53PM (19 children)

      by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Monday October 14 2019, @04:53PM (#907022) Journal

      Accusations of treason are from multiple White House staff.

      Who?

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 14 2019, @06:09PM (11 children)

        by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 14 2019, @06:09PM (#907067)

        CIA agents and diplomats involved in corrupt schemes and their coverups who were visibly shaken when they heard someone might really investigate their past crimes.

        • (Score: 1) by fustakrakich on Monday October 14 2019, @06:53PM (10 children)

          by fustakrakich (6150) on Monday October 14 2019, @06:53PM (#907088) Journal

          So, CYA? "I was just following orders"? Sorry, to be taken seriously, real evidence is required, recordings, pictures, receipts, the usual. They don't even need to expose themselves, just cough up the goods and/or go away.

          visibly shaken

          Oh brother! Now we have cheap novelists writing the news.

          This theater is one thing, quite the attraction. This audience! oy vey!

          If the truth is to be conveyed on the stage, there is only one [playbill.com]. Ok, two [mentalfloss.com]... Fine! three [youtube.com]

          --
          La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
          • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 14 2019, @07:26PM (6 children)

            by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 14 2019, @07:26PM (#907095)
            • (Score: 1) by fustakrakich on Monday October 14 2019, @07:56PM (5 children)

              by fustakrakich (6150) on Monday October 14 2019, @07:56PM (#907109) Journal

              The reporter says,

              The whistleblower said the official was "visibly shaken" by what had transpired

              Get whatever "transpired" on tape please. Everybody involved right now is too emotional.

              --
              La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
              • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 15 2019, @01:02AM (4 children)

                by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 15 2019, @01:02AM (#907193)

                We know what transpired. Ukraine had already reopened the investigations months earlier, then Trump (who didn't know) was like hey why not look into that corrupt Biden stuff, then months later there was some kind of (seemingly unrelated) small aid package Ukraine got from the US. The only people who could be "visibly shaken" when they heard such an exchange are those who were involved in the corruption somehow.

                • (Score: 1) by fustakrakich on Tuesday October 15 2019, @01:08AM (3 children)

                  by fustakrakich (6150) on Tuesday October 15 2019, @01:08AM (#907196) Journal

                  We know what transpired.

                  So you heard the tapes? Unless you have clearance you didn't mention, you only know what the tabloids are telling you. It is very presumptuous to believe what they say. Whistleblowers bring evidence, not testimony. Send them back in with a wire.

                  --
                  La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
                  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 15 2019, @01:39AM (2 children)

                    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 15 2019, @01:39AM (#907200)
                    • (Score: 1) by fustakrakich on Tuesday October 15 2019, @01:43AM (1 child)

                      by fustakrakich (6150) on Tuesday October 15 2019, @01:43AM (#907202) Journal

                      Those are based on testimony, not recordings. All the good whistleblowers from the past came with real documentation. That's what we need here.

                      --
                      La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
                      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 15 2019, @01:45AM

                        by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 15 2019, @01:45AM (#907204)

                        A Memorandum of a Telephone Conversation.· (TELCON) is not a verbatim transcript of a
                        discussion. The text in this document records the notes and recollections of Situation Room Duty
                        "Officers and-NSC policy staff assigned t_o listen.and memorialize the conversation in written form
                        as the conversation takes place. A numper of factors can affect 'the accuracy of the reco�d,
                        including poor telecommunications connections and variations in accent and/or interpretation.
                        The word "inaudible" is used to indifate portions of a conversation that the notetaker was unable
                        to hear.

                        It sounds like the same thing as a court record where someone types in what is being said as well as they can in shorthand.

          • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 14 2019, @07:38PM (2 children)

            by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 14 2019, @07:38PM (#907100)

            Sounds like someone neck deep in corruption:

            So, Eric Ciaramella may have run the meeting that investigative reporter John Solomon has identified as ‘one of the earliest documented attempts to build up the now debunked Trump-Russia collusion narrative.’

            For those of you who are not aware of NABU, it is the ‘anti-corruption’ group backed by George Soros that is actually tasked with going after people investigating real corruption.

            [...]

            This individual had previously leaked one of the President phone calls to General Kelly. Claiming the President had coordinated the firing of Comey with ‘Putin,’ when in reality it was Rod Rosenstein who recommended the firing of James Comey based on his own leaking.

            [...]

            Eric Ciaramella knows Alexandra Chalupa very well. Yes the same Chalupa that interfered in the election via Ukraine and the DNC. Yes the same Chalupa that worked with DNC serial Bomber and pedo Brett Kimberlin.

            https://patriotssoapbox.com/opinion/update-alleged-whistleblower-eric-ciaramella-may-be-connected-to-steele-dossier/ [patriotssoapbox.com]

            • (Score: 1) by khallow on Monday October 14 2019, @11:47PM (1 child)

              by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Monday October 14 2019, @11:47PM (#907173) Journal
              Sounds about as thin as the claims that so-and-so might be connected to Russian Intelligence because they met some guy that the US Intelligence claims without evidence was a Russian agent. I guess turn-about is fair play, but it would be nice to get some evidence of who supposedly did what.
              • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 15 2019, @01:54AM

                by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 15 2019, @01:54AM (#907206)

                Yea, but when you read the transcript and hear that they were "visibly shaken"...

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 14 2019, @06:15PM (6 children)

        by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 14 2019, @06:15PM (#907070)
        • (Score: 1) by khallow on Tuesday October 15 2019, @07:40AM (5 children)

          by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday October 15 2019, @07:40AM (#907283) Journal
          Glancing at the linked stories from that website, is there any evidence to support their assertions? I found it remarkable how little evidence there was to support the assertions made in the two links. The claim that Eric Ciaramella is the "whistleblower" is based on unfounded blog and tweet assertions about what the whistleblower supposedly has done or is.

          Similarly, from the other post [soylentnews.org] citing this particular blog, we have bald assertions that Ciaramella may have run a meeting which they might not have attended or the meeting might not even exist. And there's the claim of "secret impeachment proceedings" by the Democrats of the House. What's the basis for that claim?

          There's way too many lazy claims without evidence. The final question from that blog bears mentioning:

          Is Mr. Eric Ciaramella the now-infamous “whistleblower” (spy/traitor)?

          This crosses the line to an attack, particularly disturbing since it's an attack on career bureaucrats who normally would be invisible. Who is painting the target?

          Here's my take. We're seeing someone from the Trump leadership using bloggers to take out bureaucrats who aren't Trump supporters. Given how flimsy the evidence has been to this point, I imagine one or more of the bloggers mentioned gets inside dope and then coming up with a secondary excuse for why the laser targeting beam is focused on Ciaramella. This story above about Ciaramella and his purported motives may well be true, but let's remember who has inside knowledge and can most easily direct others to the attack.

          • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 15 2019, @10:37AM (4 children)

            by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 15 2019, @10:37AM (#907304)

            Could be, or just conspiracy theorists "connecting the dots", right or wrong. One thng is for sure after reading the transcript though, whoever was visibly shaken must have been involved in the corruption.

            • (Score: 1) by khallow on Tuesday October 15 2019, @02:51PM (3 children)

              by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday October 15 2019, @02:51PM (#907384) Journal
              My take still is that they're getting help connecting those dots in a way that is convenient to the Trump administration. I've seen propaganda spin like that before. And every time I tried to drill down to facts and evidence, I got links to other bloggers/twitters who just said stuff. That's the sort of murk that tells me that this story is far from mature enough to discuss. We need actual evidence of something. Not just "X tweeted" kind of stuff.
              • (Score: 1) by fustakrakich on Tuesday October 15 2019, @05:18PM (2 children)

                by fustakrakich (6150) on Tuesday October 15 2019, @05:18PM (#907454) Journal

                You're not seeing any evidence yet. (aside from the ongoing obstruction right now, no law breaking has been proven.) These "transcripts" are written by dime store novelists. I stated in another post, a real whistleblower will go in with a wire, camera, whatever, not write notes while getting the vapors over the content. Real evidence will implicate all the beautiful people. Neither side wants that. It just can't happen. Prosecution would turn into a confession, self incrimination.

                --
                La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
                • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 15 2019, @07:19PM (1 child)

                  by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 15 2019, @07:19PM (#907521)

                  These "transcripts" are written by dime store novelists

                  What makes you say that?

                  • (Score: 1) by fustakrakich on Tuesday October 15 2019, @07:43PM

                    by fustakrakich (6150) on Tuesday October 15 2019, @07:43PM (#907530) Journal

                    All the scene setting , it's irrelevant. "visibly shaken", WTF? Another *dark and stormy night*? We need tapes, not drama. Doesn't help the cause, which I expect to be about rooting out corruption, not just the president. Yeah, right!

                    --
                    La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..