SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-50246324
"The US House of Representatives has passed a resolution to formally proceed with the impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump.
The measure details how the inquiry will move into a more public phase. It was not a vote on whether the president should be removed from office.
This was the first test of support in the Democratic-controlled House for the impeachment process.
The White House condemned the vote, which passed along party lines.
Only two Democrats - representing districts that Mr Trump won handily in 2016 - voted against the resolution, along with all Republicans, for a total count of 232 in favour and 196 against."
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Trump Impeachment: House Votes to Formalise Inquiry
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 319 comments
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Is that really YOU that is reading this?
(Score: 1) by khallow on Saturday November 02 2019, @12:41AM (6 children)
(Score: 2) by Pino P on Saturday November 02 2019, @02:44PM (4 children)
Volume II of Special Counsel Robert Mueller's Report on the Investigation into Russian Interference in the 2016 Presidential Election [wikipedia.org] lists ten counts of obstruction of justice [wikipedia.org]. Under federal sentencing guidelines that apply to everybody but the President of the United States, obstruction adds two levels to the sentence for any other federal crime, which can elevate a misdemeanor to a felony. And given how elected officials are in a unique position to obstruct justice, obstruction is among the "high crimes" (abuses of an office's power) that can get a President removed from office.
(Score: 1) by khallow on Saturday November 02 2019, @07:27PM (3 children)
Alleged.
(Score: 2) by Pino P on Sunday November 03 2019, @01:54PM (1 child)
And it's the House's job to follow up on these allegations of bribery, obstruction, and other high crimes, and lay the evidence before the Senate.
(Score: 1) by khallow on Monday November 04 2019, @04:02AM
Only if there's evidence for the allegations. Trials are punishments in themselves and shouldn't be allowed on frivolously contexts. Just because a prosecutor can "indict a ham sandwich" doesn't mean that the threshold is appropriate. I think it's notable here that there's never been probable cause for the Mueller fishing expedition and none of the charges mentioned have anything to do with the purported purpose of the investigation.
(Score: 2) by All Your Lawn Are Belong To Us on Monday November 04 2019, @08:22PM
Then let them be tried.
This sig for rent.
(Score: 2) by barbara hudson on Saturday November 09 2019, @10:43PM
Obstruction was the charge that brought Nixon down, both in the eyes of the public and the republicans in the senate. He resigned when he was told that the votes weren't there to save his ass.
Of course, treason is also supported by trying to make it look like Ukraine, and not Russia, was behind the hacks of Clinton's email. And he can't pardon himself for treason since any action he took after any treasonous act is null and void.
SoylentNews is social media. Says so right in the slogan. Soylentnews is people, not tech.