SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-50246324
"The US House of Representatives has passed a resolution to formally proceed with the impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump.
The measure details how the inquiry will move into a more public phase. It was not a vote on whether the president should be removed from office.
This was the first test of support in the Democratic-controlled House for the impeachment process.
The White House condemned the vote, which passed along party lines.
Only two Democrats - representing districts that Mr Trump won handily in 2016 - voted against the resolution, along with all Republicans, for a total count of 232 in favour and 196 against."
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Trump Impeachment: House Votes to Formalise Inquiry
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 319 comments
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Is that really YOU that is reading this?
(Score: 2) by c0lo on Saturday November 02 2019, @02:39AM (1 child)
Not gonna happen any time soon. There was too much time the two societies diverged in values.
Has been, what, almost 30 years already and the inner reunification of Germany is still a thing in progress [wikipedia.org].
Bottom line: if you expect any American president to do it or consider them a failure, all American presidents will be a failure.
"Politics is the art of the possible, the attainable — the art of the next best. Otto von Bismarck"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 04 2019, @08:19PM
Other American Presidents have not presented themselves as capable of solving the NK issue, or rather, presented that they're now succeeding where past ones failed. (Not without a success like Nixon actually going to China. Trump going to NK wasn't that because there is no substance behind the gesture.) Or actively PR'ing themselves that they have "made it happen" when they literally haven't done shit that's meaningful. Other Presidents much more meaningfully show the packed fist of why an NK attack is suicide for NK (i.e. joint military exercises). They use economic tools that work to constrain NK and they use diplomatic tools to get China to make sure NK still heels on the necessary level (oops! harder to do in a trade war!)
Bottom line: Other Presidents haven't tried to claim what Trump is falsely claiming he delivers, nor have other Presidents been taken in by NK's political maneuvering the way Trump has been completely suckered. And Trump doesn't even realized he's been played - he still personally thinks he's winning that one. Because THEY know Trump and Trump refuses to pay attention to what his experts can tell him about Kim. Just like all the others he is losing because he doesn't understand. Trump may or may not understand dealmaking (I think he understands how to con others and profit-by-weasling, not to make deals) but even if we give him that bit he does not understand diplomacy except in the "If I bully them they'll give me something good for me and I'll let them have something I don't care about" sense. Not dealmaking, really, and surely not the art of the possible which diplomacy is.)
Anyway...