https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-50246324
"The US House of Representatives has passed a resolution to formally proceed with the impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump.
The measure details how the inquiry will move into a more public phase. It was not a vote on whether the president should be removed from office.
This was the first test of support in the Democratic-controlled House for the impeachment process.
The White House condemned the vote, which passed along party lines.
Only two Democrats - representing districts that Mr Trump won handily in 2016 - voted against the resolution, along with all Republicans, for a total count of 232 in favour and 196 against."
(Score: 2) by sjames on Sunday November 03 2019, @10:24PM (2 children)
The prosecutorial conduct generally shines through during the trial. The problem isn't lack of transparency, it's lack of consequences for the prosecutors when they misbehave.
(Score: 1) by fustakrakich on Monday November 04 2019, @12:11AM (1 child)
Those lack of consequences are made possible by the lack of transparency. There is no reason to cut them this kind of slack. Private citizens are entitled to privacy. Those in authority are not.
La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
(Score: 2) by sjames on Monday November 04 2019, @12:21AM
If there was no transparency, we wouldn't know about the misconduct. We DO know, but nothing happens.