Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Friday November 01 2019, @02:18PM   Printer-friendly
from the Red-Queen-Race dept.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-50246324

"The US House of Representatives has passed a resolution to formally proceed with the impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump.

The measure details how the inquiry will move into a more public phase. It was not a vote on whether the president should be removed from office.

This was the first test of support in the Democratic-controlled House for the impeachment process.

The White House condemned the vote, which passed along party lines.

Only two Democrats - representing districts that Mr Trump won handily in 2016 - voted against the resolution, along with all Republicans, for a total count of 232 in favour and 196 against."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by sjames on Sunday November 03 2019, @10:24PM (2 children)

    by sjames (2882) on Sunday November 03 2019, @10:24PM (#915459) Journal

    The prosecutorial conduct generally shines through during the trial. The problem isn't lack of transparency, it's lack of consequences for the prosecutors when they misbehave.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 1) by fustakrakich on Monday November 04 2019, @12:11AM (1 child)

    by fustakrakich (6150) on Monday November 04 2019, @12:11AM (#915487) Journal

    Those lack of consequences are made possible by the lack of transparency. There is no reason to cut them this kind of slack. Private citizens are entitled to privacy. Those in authority are not.

    --
    La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
    • (Score: 2) by sjames on Monday November 04 2019, @12:21AM

      by sjames (2882) on Monday November 04 2019, @12:21AM (#915495) Journal

      If there was no transparency, we wouldn't know about the misconduct. We DO know, but nothing happens.