Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by martyb on Wednesday November 06 2019, @07:34PM   Printer-friendly
from the what-is-the-read/write-speed? dept.

Why Microsoft and Warner Bros. Archived the Original 'Superman' Movie on a Futuristic Glass Disc

Microsoft has teamed up with Warner Bros. to store a copy of the 1978 movie "Superman" on a small glass disc about the size of a coaster. The collaboration, which will be officially unveiled at Microsoft's Ignite 2019 conference in Orlando, Florida Monday, is a first test case for a new storage technology that could eventually help safeguard Hollywood's movies and TV shows, as well as many other forms of data, for centuries to come.

"Glass has a very, very long lifetime," said Microsoft Research principal researcher Ant Rowstron in a recent conversation with Variety. "Thousands of years."

[Image] The piece of silica glass storing the 1978 "Superman" movie, measuring 7.5 cm x 7.5 cm x 2 mm. The glass contains 75.6 GB of data plus error redundancy codes.

Microsoft began to investigate glass as a storage medium in 2016 in partnership with the University of Southampton Optoelectonics Research Centre. The goal of these efforts, dubbed "Project Silica," is to find a new storage medium optimized for what industry insiders like to call cold data — the type of data you likely won't need to access for months, years, or even decades. It's data that doesn't need to sit on a server, ready to be used 24/7, but that is kept in a vault, away from anything that could corrupt it.

This is not the Superman memory crystal we need.

Also at The Verge.

Related: "5D" Laser-Based Polarization Vortex Storage Could Hold Hundreds of Terabytes for Billions of Years


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by maxwell demon on Thursday November 07 2019, @05:31PM (2 children)

    by maxwell demon (1608) on Thursday November 07 2019, @05:31PM (#917394) Journal

    With exabytes capacity, rewritability is no issue in normal use. Just write the replacement at a new position, followed by an updated directory. You'll not even come close to filling it during your lifetime.

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by takyon on Thursday November 07 2019, @06:09PM (1 child)

    by takyon (881) <reversethis-{gro ... s} {ta} {noykat}> on Thursday November 07 2019, @06:09PM (#917413) Journal

    It is useful at the terabytes level, which is what has been demonstrated (not by Microsoft).

    --
    [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
    • (Score: 2) by maxwell demon on Thursday November 07 2019, @06:57PM

      by maxwell demon (1608) on Thursday November 07 2019, @06:57PM (#917434) Journal

      I was replying to your last paragraph, where you explicitly mentioned exabytes, but conditioned on re-writability. My point is that at that size, for usual purposes re-writability of the medium doesn't matter.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.