Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by n1 on Wednesday August 20 2014, @02:51PM   Printer-friendly
from the avoiding-accidents-is-dangerous-driving dept.

BBC reports that according to Dmitri Dolgov, lead software engineer for Google's driverless car project, Google's self-driving cars are programmed to exceed speed limits by up to 10 mph when surrounding vehicles are breaking the speed limit, because going more slowly could actually present a danger. In many countries, including the United States, the speed limit is a rather nebulous thing. It's posted, but on many roads hardly anybody obeys it.

Almost every driver speeds regularly, and anybody going at or below the limit on a clear road outside the right lane is typically an obstruction to traffic—they will find themselves being tailgated or passed at high speed on the left and right. A ticket for going 1 mph over the limit is an extremely rare thing and usually signals a cop with another agenda or a special day of zero-tolerance enforcement. In fact, many drivers feel safe from tickets up to about 9 mph over the limit. Tickets happen there, but the major penalties require going faster, and most police like to go after that one weaving, racing guy who thinks the limit does not apply to him. Commenting on Google self-drive cars' ability to exceed the speed limit, a Department for Transport spokesman said: "There are no plans to change speed limits, which will still apply to driverless cars".

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 21 2014, @06:39AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 21 2014, @06:39AM (#83846)

    Once someone I know let someone else drive his car (this is in the U.S.). The driver crossed a red light illegally and a ticket came in the mail from one of those ticket cameras. When the owner went to fight it the authorities insisted the owner was the driver based on the photo. The judge also agreed. The owner kept insisting he wasn't the driver. The judge said the driver sure looks like the owner. The owner said he couldn't have been the driver because he was the passenger. So they took a look at the picture of the passenger and, sure enough, it was the owner. The driver wasn't the owner. Case closed. However, they couldn't really go after the driver because the driver was from overseas and had an international license. The driver was no longer in the United States. So the court just dropped the case. In such a case what could they do?

  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by monster on Thursday August 21 2014, @10:30AM

    by monster (1260) on Thursday August 21 2014, @10:30AM (#83877) Journal

    Put him on the terrorist list.

    Now, on a more serious note, it's the same case that happens in Europe with foreign cars: Either the police stops the car, identifies the driver, issues the ticket and gets it paid or it ends being not economical to enforce it (more money spent in the proceedings than got with the ticket). It may suck, but that's life.