SoylentNews

In myprevious journal entry, I wrote about how a cop and their employer were ordered to pay $20,000 for writing a really stupid ticket.

Here's something in the judgment, as reported by Radio-Canada (the national French TV/radio network - yes I am bilingual, tabernac), that people in other countries, including my neighbours to the south, might want to consider (because countries, while not bound to rulings in other countries, sometimes use them to inform their judgments).

The court stated that police officers cannot blindly follow their training as a defence to liability. They must use reasonable judgment (aka common sense).

So, not only is "I was just following orders" not a defence, neither is "I was just following my training."

Given the ongoing problems with the Montreal police force, the refusal of leadership to admit to racism ("there's a systemic problem, not racism"), and the lack of trust in the police by the general population (even people who don't have a criminal record don't want to call them), at last here's a cudgel to beat them with to maybe force them to change.

Here's one recent example of police stupidity

A Montreal mom was left confused after an officer wrote her a $169 ticket for driving in the HOV lane with her daughter. The officer claimed the nine-year-old passenger needed a driver’s licence.

Stéphanie Émond was driving in the Sources Boulevard carpool lane last week when the officer pulled her over. The lane is reserved for buses, taxis and cars carrying two or more people, as the roadside sign indicated, so Émond was puzzled. Even more so when she received the pricey ticket.

The officer claimed that in order to drive in the high-occupancy vehicle lane, Émond’s daughter needed to have a driver’s licence herself. After all, carpool lanes are meant to keep more cars off the road. Since her daughter couldn’t drive herself yet, they’re not reducing emissions.

“She went on to say, ‘With your daughter not having a driver’s permit, we’re obviously not getting cars off the road this way.’ So she thought that I deserved a ticket,” Émond recalled on CTV News Channel Wednesday. “She seemed very sure of what she was telling me.”

Émond understands the eco-friendly purpose of a carpool lane, but says there’s no clear definition of who constitutes a “passenger” in a carpool lane so she shouldn’t have been ticketed.

“When there’s no definition, we cannot make one up. It has to be written somewhere and we can’t just issue (a ticket) based on interpretation of the law -- even if it made a lot of sense,” she said.

The Quebec website for the Canadian Automobile Association supports Émond’s position. There is no age requirement for carpooling, it says, quoting Transport Québec spokesperson Solène Lemay as saying “a parent taking a child to daycare is assumed to be carpooling.”

You really can't make this shit up.

The guy who destroyed his SUV by blocking a stolen car from hitting pedestrians a couple of weeks ago is lucky he didn't get a ticket for obstructing traffic and another one for causing an accident.

Anyone else got crazy stupid cop stories?