Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Wednesday December 04 2019, @04:46AM   Printer-friendly
from the what-did-he-expect? dept.

Developer faces prison time for giving blockchain talk in North Korea

The prominent hacker and Ethereum developer Virgil Griffith was arrested by the US government Friday after he spoke at an April conference on blockchain technologies in North Korea. The US government considers his presentation to be a transfer of technology—and therefore a violation of US sanctions.

But Griffith's defenders, including Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin, describe the arrest as a massive overreaction. Griffith worked for the Ethereum Foundation, and Buterin called him a friend.

"I don't think what Virgil did gave the DPRK [Democratic People's Republic of Korea] any kind of real help in doing anything bad," Buterin tweeted on Sunday. "He delivered a presentation based on publicly available info about open source software."

But federal prosecutors argue that Griffith, a US citizen residing in Singapore, knew full well that his trip violated US sanction laws. They say he sought approval for the trip from the US State Department, and his request was denied. Griffith made the trip anyway, traveling through China to evade US travel restrictions.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by sjames on Wednesday December 04 2019, @08:54AM (6 children)

    by sjames (2882) on Wednesday December 04 2019, @08:54AM (#928027) Journal

    It doesn't override itself. He gave aid and comfort to an enemy of the United States.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Redundant=1, Insightful=2, Total=3
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday December 04 2019, @10:28AM (3 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday December 04 2019, @10:28AM (#928056)

    Incorrect. The United States has no enemies, and the only way it could have an enemy is if it were to formally declare war on another nation. This is frowned upon by the UN Charter, however, so the best Trump can to is have "frenemies", like Melania. Oh, and if exaeta suggests you sue anyone, run away very fast. The man is a legal imbecile. #exaeta'sCow, man!

    • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday December 04 2019, @01:40PM (1 child)

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday December 04 2019, @01:40PM (#928094)

      I don't think there was ever a real peace treaty that formally put an end to the Korean War. So the Korean War is still really ongoing although there has been an uneasy ceasefire between North and South Korea since 1953. Since there is a mutual defense treaty between the United States and South Korea, that makes North Korea an enemy of the United States thanks to these treaty obligations, even if no formal declaration of war was made.

      • (Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday December 04 2019, @05:01PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday December 04 2019, @05:01PM (#928162)

        There was no declaration of war by South Korea, either, since it did not exist! There was only a UN Security council resolution, only possible because the Soviet Union got pissed and walked out. They never did that again. But no, no state of war exists.

        (Interesting case where the US Military wanted to charge a GI with treason, but for it to be treason, the US has to have an enemy, that is, in a declared war. The defense said it was not treason, since there was no declared war in Korea. The prosecution said, "Yeah, but this many people are dying every day!" Point being, combat and hostile relations are !war. )

    • (Score: 0, Offtopic) by khallow on Wednesday December 04 2019, @08:36PM

      by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday December 04 2019, @08:36PM (#928243) Journal

      and the only way it could have an enemy is if it were to formally declare war on another nation

      What law determines that? I don't see it in the US Constitution, for example.

  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by DannyB on Wednesday December 04 2019, @04:05PM (1 child)

    by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday December 04 2019, @04:05PM (#928144) Journal

    He gave aid and comfort to an enemy of the United States.

    If the president can do it, then anyone should be allowed to do it.

    --
    If you think a fertilized egg is a child but an immigrant child is not, please don't pretend your concerns are religious
    • (Score: 2) by sjames on Wednesday December 04 2019, @06:14PM

      by sjames (2882) on Wednesday December 04 2019, @06:14PM (#928186) Journal

      In a world where rule of law prevailed, they would be cellmates.