Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by martyb on Saturday December 21 2019, @01:53PM   Printer-friendly
from the it's-for-your-own-good dept.

When Andreas Gal, CEO of Silk Labs and a US citizen, returned to the US from a business trip in Europe last year, he was detained by US Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) for secondary screening. He claims he was threatened with unwarranted charges, denied access to an attorney, and told he had to unlock his electronic devices before he would be allowed to leave.

[...] Despite being told he had no right to an attorney, he says he refused to answer questions and was eventually allowed to go without unlocking his devices, though his Global Entry card – a subscription-based biometric border entry program to facilitate travel – was taken from him.

On Wednesday, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) sued CBP claiming that the agency maintains secretive units to "detain, search, question, and/or deny entry to people with valid travel documents who present no security risk."

The ACLU complaint, filed in the Eastern District of New York, seeks CBP documents under the Freedom of Information Act that the agency has refused to produce.

It contends that these Tactical Terrorism Response Teams (TTRTs) have operated for the past few years and target individuals, including US citizens, "who do not present a security risk but may hold information or have a connection to individuals of interest to the US government."

"The public has a right to know how these teams operate, how their officers are trained, and whether the guidelines that govern their activities contain civil liberties and privacy safeguards," the ACLU said in a statement announcing its lawsuit.

The complaint says TTRTs target people without valid cause, based on hunches and instinct, raising the likelihood that travelers are subject to profiling based on race, religion, ethnicity, national origin, or proxies for those attributes. As such, TTRTs may be violating protections guaranteed by the US Constitution.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by Ethanol-fueled on Saturday December 21 2019, @09:51PM (1 child)

    by Ethanol-fueled (2792) on Saturday December 21 2019, @09:51PM (#935062) Homepage

    > Click on link
    > Wikipedia-style Beg-a-thon popup
    > Reads "For three years, the ACLU has challenged Trump’s abuses of power. People are counting on us to keep fighting for immigrant families, access to abortion, voting rights and more."

    Yeech, they really went full-rootless cosmopolitan NPR-style with that one. I wonder how those lawyers would feel when these "immigrant families" move next door to them and illegally vote for more in federal elections because "voting rights."

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 21 2019, @11:09PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 21 2019, @11:09PM (#935076)

    For three years, the ACLU has challenged Trump’s abuses of power

    Thank you for finding this. That was my point.

    keep fighting for immigrant families, access to abortion, voting rights and more

    Fight for immigrants' lawful rights, yes. Fight to actively import more / let illegals stay, hell no.