Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by martyb on Saturday December 21 2019, @01:53PM   Printer-friendly
from the it's-for-your-own-good dept.

When Andreas Gal, CEO of Silk Labs and a US citizen, returned to the US from a business trip in Europe last year, he was detained by US Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) for secondary screening. He claims he was threatened with unwarranted charges, denied access to an attorney, and told he had to unlock his electronic devices before he would be allowed to leave.

[...] Despite being told he had no right to an attorney, he says he refused to answer questions and was eventually allowed to go without unlocking his devices, though his Global Entry card – a subscription-based biometric border entry program to facilitate travel – was taken from him.

On Wednesday, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) sued CBP claiming that the agency maintains secretive units to "detain, search, question, and/or deny entry to people with valid travel documents who present no security risk."

The ACLU complaint, filed in the Eastern District of New York, seeks CBP documents under the Freedom of Information Act that the agency has refused to produce.

It contends that these Tactical Terrorism Response Teams (TTRTs) have operated for the past few years and target individuals, including US citizens, "who do not present a security risk but may hold information or have a connection to individuals of interest to the US government."

"The public has a right to know how these teams operate, how their officers are trained, and whether the guidelines that govern their activities contain civil liberties and privacy safeguards," the ACLU said in a statement announcing its lawsuit.

The complaint says TTRTs target people without valid cause, based on hunches and instinct, raising the likelihood that travelers are subject to profiling based on race, religion, ethnicity, national origin, or proxies for those attributes. As such, TTRTs may be violating protections guaranteed by the US Constitution.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday December 22 2019, @12:43AM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday December 22 2019, @12:43AM (#935101)

    What did the EFF do to Stallman? I think you meant the FSF, the organization that he founded and was booted out of thanks to SJWs [medium.com].

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +1  
       Offtopic=1, Informative=2, Total=3
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   1  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday December 22 2019, @01:52AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday December 22 2019, @01:52AM (#935109)

    RMS was being pushed out at MIT, his dropping out at the FSF was entirely his doing. He's almost 70, so you can forgive him if he wants to step back from battling with power hungry assholes. However, he has this other organization, GNU, in his back pocket that is intertwined with the FSF due to both being started by the same man. And he has made it clear that he is holding on to it. His handling of the FSF situation, not any manufactured SJW bullshit about Epstein, is really annoying to me.

    It's 4 months since the shit hit the fan, and the FSF still hasn't been able to come up with new leadership, nor do I see any urgency to do so. The staff are still keeping things running, but I require to know if it will be a person with Free Software creds or a SJW opportunist that takes the lead before I will consider donating to them again.