Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by azrael on Saturday August 23 2014, @12:21PM   Printer-friendly
from the some-pills-to-sell-you dept.

Sophie Curtis reports at the Telegraph that an ad-free internet would cost each user about £140 ($230) a year – a sum that the vast majority of UK web users say they would never pay. Ebuzzing calculated the average ‘value’ of each web user by dividing the amount of money spent on digital advertising in the UK in 2013 (£6.4 billion) by the number of UK web users (45 million).

However in a survey of more than 1,400 UK consumers, 98 per cent said they would not be willing to pay this amount to browse the internet without advertisements and although most consumers regard ads as a necessary trade-off to keep the internet free, they will go to great lengths to avoid advertising they do not wish to see.

"It’s clear the ad industry has a major role to play in keeping web content free, but we have to respond to what consumers are telling us," says Jeremy Arditi. "We need to get better at engaging, not better at interrupting. That means introducing new formats which consumers find less invasive, more creative ads that are better placed, and giving consumers a degree of choice and control."

The study also looked specifically at the mobile app sector and found that 77 per cent of consumers never upgrade to paid for versions of free mobile apps. "Publishers of mobile apps will remain heavily reliant on in-app advertising to fund their content creation," says Arditi. "That means the same rules apply – they must give consumers ads that offer choice, relevance, entertainment and brevity."

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by cafebabe on Saturday August 23 2014, @05:18PM

    by cafebabe (894) on Saturday August 23 2014, @05:18PM (#84706) Journal

    Nielsen's law means that the bandwidth cost for serving adverts falls to zero. However, how much time, effort, hardware and electricity does it take to choose the best advert? As I understand, some analytic systems have more than 1,000 harddisks and cost millions of dollars. But websites run on advertising revenue aren't seeing this money and, arguably, targeted adverts aren't adding value.

    Previously, advertising required selecting a publication which aligned with your target demographic and then placing the biggest advert you could afford. That could cost tens of thousands of dollars. However, it signaled a certain amount of integrity. Nowadays, extremely niche demographics can be reached for US$100 or less. And once you've hooked them, you can disappear. Even if they find you, you're not worth suing.

    --
    1702845791×2
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3