Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Saturday January 04 2020, @09:55PM   Printer-friendly
from the IIRC dept.

Engrams emerging as the basic unit of memory:

Though scientist Richard Semon introduced the concept of the "engram" 115 years ago to posit a neural basis for memory, direct evidence for engrams has only begun to accumulate recently as sophisticated technologies and methods have become available. In a new review in Science, Professors Susumu Tonegawa of The Picower Institute for Learning and Memory at MIT and Sheena Josselyn of the Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids) and the University of Toronto describe the rapid progress they and colleagues have been making over the last dozen years in identifying, characterizing and even manipulating engrams, as well as the major outstanding questions of the field.

Experiments in rodents have revealed that engrams exist as multiscale networks of neurons. An experience becomes stored as a potentially retrievable memory in the brain when excited neurons in a brain region such as the hippocampus or amygdala become recruited into a local ensemble. These ensembles combine with others in other regions, such as the cortex, into an "engram complex." Crucial to this process of linking engram cells is the ability of neurons to forge new circuit connections, via processes known as "synaptic plasticity" and "dendritic spine formation." Importantly, experiments show that the memory initially stored across an engram complex can be retrieved by its reactivation but may also persist "silently" even when memories cannot be naturally recalled, for instance in mouse models used to study memory disorders such as early stage Alzheimer's disease.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Informative) by barbara hudson on Saturday January 04 2020, @11:04PM (10 children)

    by barbara hudson (6443) <barbara.Jane.hudson@icloud.com> on Saturday January 04 2020, @11:04PM (#939667) Journal
    The concept isn't special. We've always known that memories are stored as relations between neurons. Calling them engrams, or even the concept of them, isn't needed and brings nothing to the table.

    So they've just "discovered" that memory is holographic (information is stored in various areas that when combined make up one memory) . Come off it, we knew that decades ago.

    --
    SoylentNews is social media. Says so right in the slogan. Soylentnews is people, not tech.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   0  
       Informative=2, Overrated=2, Total=4
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 4, Informative) by hemocyanin on Sunday January 05 2020, @12:49AM

    by hemocyanin (186) on Sunday January 05 2020, @12:49AM (#939702) Journal

    As an additional point, don't scientologists use the phrase engram to mean some BS? Using this label, even it was co-opted by scientologists and has deeper roots, lends some superficial credence to the cult. Just use a different word that means the same thing.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Engram_(Dianetics) [wikipedia.org]

  • (Score: 5, Informative) by NickM on Sunday January 05 2020, @01:16AM (3 children)

    by NickM (2867) Subscriber Badge on Sunday January 05 2020, @01:16AM (#939705) Journal
    Pretty picture from the article behind that pres release: https://science.sciencemag.org/content/367/6473/eaaw4325#F1 [sciencemag.org] More seriously the real article is a review summary. It shows the state of the art in a specific field at a specific point in time. In some of the experiments reviewed they are able to create artificial mouse memory. From https://www.nature.com/articles/s41593-019-0389-0 [nature.com]

    Memory is coded by patterns of neural activity in distinct circuits. Therefore, it should be possible to reverse engineer a memory by artificially creating these patterns of activity in the absence of a sensory experience. In olfactory conditioning, an odor conditioned stimulus (CS) is paired with an unconditioned stimulus (US; for example, a footshock), and the resulting CS–US association guides future behavior. Here we replaced the odor CS with optogenetic stimulation of a specific olfactory glomerulus and the US with optogenetic stimulation of distinct inputs into theventral tegmental area that mediate either aversion or reward.

    That is pretty awesome and creepy: artificial aversion or repulsion to a smell the mouse never experienced ! I can accord you that the linked press release is kind of thin but the source material is quite dense in information. Also to those who don't have acces remember about sci-hub.tw !

    --
    I a master of typographic, grammatical and miscellaneous errors !
    • (Score: 2) by barbara hudson on Sunday January 05 2020, @03:45AM

      by barbara hudson (6443) <barbara.Jane.hudson@icloud.com> on Sunday January 05 2020, @03:45AM (#939737) Journal

      Well, I may never have smelled 3-week-old dead cow, but I'm pretty sure that I wouldn't need to have a false memory implanted to experience revulsion to it.

      For proof, we'd need to test for something the animal was normally attracted to.

       

      Thought of the day: "After you stop using social media and online videos long enough you no longer have the free time for them."

      --
      SoylentNews is social media. Says so right in the slogan. Soylentnews is people, not tech.
    • (Score: 3, Interesting) by Mer on Sunday January 05 2020, @07:10AM (1 child)

      by Mer (8009) on Sunday January 05 2020, @07:10AM (#939772)

      And just with that, we can put total recall on the list of things that are indefinitely twenty years away.
      (minus the mars colony bit, that's indefinitely ten years away).

      --
      Shut up!, he explained.
      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 06 2020, @08:47PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 06 2020, @08:47PM (#940359)

        Only ten years between them? Weren't some of the poor martian locals supposedly born there?

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 06 2020, @07:35AM (4 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 06 2020, @07:35AM (#940109)

    We've always known that memories are stored as relations between neurons.

    Citations please? AI examples don't count.

    • (Score: 2) by barbara hudson on Tuesday January 07 2020, @01:12AM (3 children)

      by barbara hudson (6443) <barbara.Jane.hudson@icloud.com> on Tuesday January 07 2020, @01:12AM (#940455) Journal
      Look, we knew this way before the Internet existed. There is actually no other way it could be done. As an analogue, take a look at DNA. The same gene, you start and stop at different points, you get different proteins, so multiple proteins are encoded within the same sequence. The only difference with memory is that it is not a sequence, because neurons and nerves are not sequences - they are laid out in 3d, and always have been.

      So the same nerves and neurons can participate in storing multiple memories.

      Thought of the day: Thanks to systemd, even linux isn't linux any more.

      --
      SoylentNews is social media. Says so right in the slogan. Soylentnews is people, not tech.
      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 07 2020, @10:40AM (2 children)

        by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 07 2020, @10:40AM (#940582)
        You have not proven that memories aren't stored within the neurons themselves.
        • (Score: 2) by barbara hudson on Tuesday January 07 2020, @09:09PM (1 child)

          by barbara hudson (6443) <barbara.Jane.hudson@icloud.com> on Tuesday January 07 2020, @09:09PM (#940747) Journal

          They are stored in both the neurons and the way the neurons are connected. Neither can exist without the other and still store useful information. That this is not blindingly obvious is a failure of both curiosity and basic cognition (bad neural net??? :-).

          --
          SoylentNews is social media. Says so right in the slogan. Soylentnews is people, not tech.
          • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday January 16 2020, @08:53AM

            by Anonymous Coward on Thursday January 16 2020, @08:53AM (#943935)

            We've always known that memories are stored as relations between neurons.

            They are stored in both the neurons and the way the neurons are connected.

            There are alternate possible explanations. For example memories could be stored in a neuron/computer but how accessible a memory/computer is or how it's accessible to other neurons/computers can be dependent on how it's connected to them, and how good the connections are.

            Yes an isolated computer may not be as useful as a connected computer but that's just moving the goal post. It's not about usefulness or ease of recall, it's about where those memories are stored.

            So what makes you so sure that memories are stored as relations between neurons? Where's your proof? Saying it's blindingly obvious isn't proof, especially when there are alternate explanations that haven't been disproven. Not saying those alternate explanations are true, but have they really been eliminated as possibilities?