Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Monday January 06 2020, @10:14AM   Printer-friendly
from the point-and-transmit dept.

Arthur T Knackerbracket has found the following story:

One of the new chips in this year’s crop of iPhones is the U1; it provides Ultra Wideband (UWB) connectivity that, in conjunction with Internet of Things (IoT) technology, could offer a myriad of new services for enterprises and consumers.

As Apple puts it, UWB technology offers “spatial awareness" – the ability for your phone to recognize its surroundings and the objects in it. Essentially, one iPhone 11 user can point his or her phone at another and transfer a file or photo.

While the technology isn't new, Apple’s implementation marks the first time UWB has been used in a modern smartphone.

UWB is a short-range, wireless communication protocol that – like Bluetooth or Wi-Fi – uses radio waves. But it differs substantially in that IT operates at a very high frequency. As its name denotes, it also uses a wide spectrum of several GHz. One way to think of it is as a radar that can continuously scan an entire room and precisely lock onto an object like a laser beam to discover its location and communicate data.

In the early 2000s, UWB saw limited use in military radars and covert communications and was used briefly as a form of medical imaging, such as remote heart monitoring systems; Its adoption lagged until recently when commercial interests began exploring potential uses.

Today, its primary purpose is expected to be location discovery and device ranging, according to Phil Solis, an IDC research director. While both Wi-Fi and Bluetooth have been modified to allow greater accuracy in locating other devices and connecting to them, UWB is natively more precise, uses less power and, as production of UWB chips ramps up over time, holds the promise of a lower price point.

Samsung, Apple and Huawei, the world’s largest smartphone makers, are all involved in UWB projects including chip and antenna production, according to Solis. Apple, however, is the first to actually deploy it in a phone.

Samsung, along with Xiaomi, NXP, Sony, Bosch and others, are also a part of the FiRa (fine ranging) Consortium, which is working to grow the UWB ecosystem. That ecosystem is built atop the existing IEE 802.15.4/4x standard for low-data-rate wireless communication.

A UWB transmitter works by sending billions of pulses (UWB was previously known as “pulse radio”) across the wide spectrum frequency; a corresponding receiver then translates the pulses into data by listening for a familiar pulse sequence sent by the transmitter. Pulses are sent about one every two nanoseconds, which helps UWB achieve its real-time accuracy.

UWB is extremely low power but the high bandwidth (500MHz) is ideal for relaying a lot data from a host device to other devices up to about 30 feet away. Unlike Wi-Fi, however, it is not particularly good at transmitting through walls.

“Because it’s such high frequency, it’s very much line of sight,” said Jack Gold, principal analyst at J. Gold Associates. “So, the advantage is because it has such wide bandwidth, it has a lot of data capability. If you’re transmitting a 60GHz signal that’s 500MHz wide… and multiply that by however many channels you can do, you’re talking very wide band.”

To increase UWB’s range and reception reliability, a MIMO (multiple-input and multiple-output), distributed antenna system has been added to the standard that enables short-range networks. The antennas can be embedded into a smartphone or other devices such as a wristband or smart key.

When a smartphone with UWB (like the latest iPhone) comes close to another UWB device, the two start ranging, or measuring, their exact distance. The ranging is accomplished through “Time of Flight” (ToF) measurements between the devices; these are used to calculate the roundtrip time of challenge/response packets.

Based on the IEEE 802.15.4a standard, UWB can determine the relative position of peer devices with line of sight at up to 200 meters, according to the FiRa Consortium. The Consortium is currently adding a security extension – specified in IEEE 802.15.4z – to make it a “secure fine-ranging technology.”


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Rupert Pupnick on Monday January 06 2020, @12:28PM (7 children)

    by Rupert Pupnick (7277) on Monday January 06 2020, @12:28PM (#940158) Journal

    Lots of hype, but not much in the way of quantifiable performance.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 06 2020, @12:46PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 06 2020, @12:46PM (#940167)
    I wonder about the use case. How often someone has to transfer files to another phone? In my experience, we send files not to phones, but to people, and we use email, SMS, Dropbox, Skype or any number of other messengers and cloud drives that are completely platform-agnostic. Nobody that I know ever wanted ability to send something from one phone to another, though we already have it as Bluetooth and NFC [androidauthority.com].
  • (Score: 2) by RS3 on Monday January 06 2020, @02:16PM (1 child)

    by RS3 (6367) on Monday January 06 2020, @02:16PM (#940180)

    Not sure how complete this is, but at least some numbers: https://www.pcmag.com/encyclopedia/term/53599/uwb [pcmag.com]

    • (Score: 2) by Rupert Pupnick on Monday January 06 2020, @05:00PM

      by Rupert Pupnick (7277) on Monday January 06 2020, @05:00PM (#940262) Journal

      Thanks for the link, though it has all tech detail of a 5G spec, which is to say not much.

      I agree with the comments to the effect that this is for the benefit of advertisers since the (observable) impact on end users will be nil.

  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by ikanreed on Monday January 06 2020, @03:30PM (3 children)

    by ikanreed (3164) on Monday January 06 2020, @03:30PM (#940211) Journal

    Performance for who? Advertisers will pay quite handsomely for this information, and don't even care if it's sometimes wrong.

    • (Score: 3, Interesting) by RS3 on Monday January 06 2020, @05:45PM (2 children)

      by RS3 (6367) on Monday January 06 2020, @05:45PM (#940275)

      I would bet the advertisers _do_ care if the spying info is wrong, but they don't want to spend money verifying it. We know the sellers surely don't care.

      For 20+ years I've thought the best way to thwart the spying is to clog the system with misinformation, errors, conflicting information, turn phones OFF, leave them home, delete cookies often, don't ever get a google account, etc.

      • (Score: 4, Insightful) by ikanreed on Monday January 06 2020, @07:28PM (1 child)

        by ikanreed (3164) on Monday January 06 2020, @07:28PM (#940322) Journal

        If you're paying for 10,000,000 impressions of ads to people who ate cereal with their family this morning, you don't care that you got 500,000 where the computer mistook a sad lonely loser with a cat for your demo.

        Advertisers care abstractly about accuracy in that they want "reach" to target demographics. They don't care about also spamming non-targets occasionally. That our dystopia is half-assed doesn't bother anyone tabulating sales numbers for a living.

        • (Score: 2) by RS3 on Monday January 06 2020, @08:44PM

          by RS3 (6367) on Monday January 06 2020, @08:44PM (#940357)

          Well written and I agree.

          I was thinking more about the company who is gathering the data and guaranteeing its accuracy to advertisers who buy the data.