Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Monday January 06 2020, @05:38PM   Printer-friendly
from the false-alarm dept.

A 2017 report of the discovery of a particular kind of Majorana fermion—the chiral Majorana fermion, referred to as the “angel particle”—is likely a false alarm, according to new research. Majorana fermions are enigmatic particles that act as their own antiparticle and were first hypothesized to exist in 1937. They are of immense interest to physicists because their unique properties could allow them to be used in the construction of a topological quantum computer.

A team of physicists at Penn State and the University of Wurzburg in Germany led by Cui-Zu Chang, an assistant professor of physics at Penn State studied over three dozen devices similar to the one used to produce the angel particle in the 2017 report. They found that the feature that was claimed to be the manifestation of the angel particle was unlikely to be induced by the existence of the angel particle. A paper describing the research appears on January 3, 2020 in the journal Science.

“When the Italian physicist Ettore Majorana predicted the possibility of a new fundamental particle which is its own antiparticle, little could he have envisioned the long-lasting implications of his imaginative idea,” said Nitin Samarth, Downsbrough Department Head and professor of physics at Penn State. “Over 80 years after Majorana’s prediction, physicists continue to actively search for signatures of the still elusive “Majorana fermion” in diverse corners of the universe.”

Journal Reference:

Morteza Kayyalha, Di Xiao, Ruoxi Zhang, Jaeho Shin, Jue Jiang, Fei Wang, Yi-Fan Zhao, Run Xiao, Ling Zhang, Kajetan M. Fijalkowski, Pankaj Mandal, Martin Winnerlein, Charles Gould, Qi Li, Laurens W. Molenkamp, Moses H. W. Chan, Nitin Samarth, Cui-Zu Chang. Absence of evidence for chiral Majorana modes in quantum anomalous Hall-superconductor devices. Science, 2020; 367 (6473): 64 DOI: 10.1126/science.aax6361


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by stormwyrm on Tuesday January 07 2020, @12:27AM

    by stormwyrm (717) on Tuesday January 07 2020, @12:27AM (#940436) Journal
    There is a possibility that neutrinos could be Majorana fermions. If they are, then the neutrino would be its own antiparticle, and neutrinoless double beta decay [wikipedia.org] should be possible. It is still unknown whether or not this is so: given how rare even regular double beta decays are, a beta decay where the two neutrinos annihilate each other should be rarer still, even if it were possible. That would be a violation of lepton number conservation by the way, and that is a rather big consequence.
    --
    Numquam ponenda est pluralitas sine necessitate.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2