Wakaranai writes:
"BBC News has a video report that a UK company, Hybrid Air Vehicles, is developing helium-filled hybrid airships for passengers and cargo.
The first prototype was 91 m long, and was built for the US Army. However, the military project was scrapped due to budget cuts, and the airship was returned to the UK. A larger vehicle is on the drawing board.
One of the companies shareholders is... err.. Bruce Dickinson from Iron Maiden!"
(Score: 5, Insightful) by bucc5062 on Saturday March 01 2014, @01:18PM
The crew of the airship thanks you for your concern. Dude, that is some tough love.
The more things change, the more they look the same
(Score: 3, Interesting) by TheRaven on Saturday March 01 2014, @03:10PM
sudo mod me up
(Score: 3, Informative) by TheRaven on Saturday March 01 2014, @03:34PM
The fuel numbers are interesting: 3100 liters/day, 80 knots, 1225kg of cargo. That means that, per day, it travels at most 1920 nautical miles, so uses about 1.3l of fuel per nautical mile per ton. To put that in perspective, a 747-8F (new freight variant of the 747) has a 140,000kg cargo payload, has a fuel capacity of 230,630l and a range of 4,390 nmi. That means that it uses about 0.38l of fuel per nautical mile per ton. The airship just about beats that if you assume the 5 ton load.
Being able to vertically take off and land in a field is an advantage in the kind of disaster relief role that they are apparently aiming for, but I find it a bit hard to understand how they manage such poor fuel efficiency. I'd guess that it's because keeping a modern aeroplane aloft doesn't actually use much energy and the fat shape of the dirigible means that it suffers a lot more from drag.
sudo mod me up
(Score: 2) by VLM on Monday March 03 2014, @07:07PM
"I find it a bit hard to understand how they manage such poor fuel efficiency."
The smaller the engine the lower the efficiency. I imagine the little weed whacker engines on the blimp are not terribly efficient compared to the giant 747 engines.
Also the 747 flys extremely high altitude, lower air resistance.
Finally I imagine there's a huge fudge factor to account for wind, and its going to be brutally expensive pushing that blimp into headwinds.
(Score: 1) by Ryuugami on Saturday March 01 2014, @04:28PM
Seems like a nice retirement plan for military drone controllers :)
If a shit storm's on the horizon, it's good to know far enough ahead you can at least bring along an umbrella. - D.Weber
(Score: 2) by evilviper on Saturday March 01 2014, @05:18PM
The cargo they're carrying on every trip is going to be worth many times more money than they'd earn in their lifetime (assuming a small crew). Financial concerns will ensure work goes into making the ship reliable and survivable.
The issue of flammable gas in the balloon is just one of psychology. A huge fire looks bad and scary, and the Hindenburg disaster is burned into everyone's minds. But even with a huge fire and no safety measures, most people survived the Hindenburg, and quite a few people died in helium-filled airships. Even WWI British pilots had a hell of a difficult time shooting down hydrogen-filled zeppelins that were bombing their cities.
Heck, the low air-speed should make it far easier to bail-out of a failing airship than any other aircraft, so accident survival is likely quite high.
Hydrogen cyanide is a delicious and necessary part of the human diet.