SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
The National Science Foundation is funding the “Truthy” database, intended to detect “false and misleading ideas,” "political smears," and other "social pollution” in online political activity. Researchers at Indiana University have received $919,917 (so far) for this project. The resulting open-source platform will be made publicly available, including via a web service open to the public for "monitoring trends, bursts, and suspicious memes.”
According to the grant, “This service could mitigate the diffusion of false and misleading ideas, detect hate speech and subversive propaganda, and assist in the preservation of open debate."
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Database to Track 'Suspicious Memes' on Twitter
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 39 comments
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Whenever I feel like exercise, I lie down until the feeling passes.
(Score: 5, Interesting) by edIII on Tuesday August 26 2014, @05:09PM
None of that is bad for business though. Information Asymmetry helps them, not hurts them. At least usually.
Sounds nice, but I'm betting it will be used to manage false information out there and prevent dissent, and attack valid information that is damaging to business.
Technically, lunchtime is at any moment. It's just a wave function.
(Score: 2) by PinkyGigglebrain on Tuesday August 26 2014, @05:46PM
where are mod points when I need them?
"Beware those who would deny you Knowledge, For in their hearts they dream themselves your Master."
(Score: 1) by JNCF on Tuesday August 26 2014, @07:59PM
I think information asymmetry is bad for businesses as a whole (The Almighty Market), but good for whoever is sitting on a stockpile of secret information. So it's bad for some businesses, and those businesses happen to have a lot of money. They also have a lot of friends in Washington, unrelatedly.
In this case reducing information asymmetry would be bad not only for the business making money off of selling this information, but also those businesses who are running marketing campaigns that are intended to look like normal people talking about products.
It would also be bad for governments that are running secret social media propaganda campaigns [theguardian.com] in hopes of influencing the crowds. [soylentnews.org]
To me, reducing information asymmtry is the next best thing to shutting down the surveillance state (which should still be top priority). If the G-men get to watch us all, let's all watch us all.
(Score: 2) by edIII on Tuesday August 26 2014, @11:34PM
I'm in complete agreement. At the same time though, I'm extremely suspicious of any kind of Big Data project to develop new tools. That's essentially what this is, a new tool to analyze all the user generated content.
Who is using the tool?
Forgive my cynicism but when this is offered as a "service" the last person I see paying for and using it is someone with the interests of the people and common man at heart.
Technically, lunchtime is at any moment. It's just a wave function.
(Score: 1) by JNCF on Wednesday August 27 2014, @02:23AM
I understand your cynicism, I just think it might be misplaced. Maybe you should worry about the fact that the federal government is sponsoring this, and ask why. But concern that this is a service that will be offered to a select few at a price seems to go against the wording of the grant funding the project. From TFA:
Maybe I'm being too hopeful, but it sounds like this is an awesome open-source data mining tool that could potentially be used to spot the sock-puppets of nefarious governments and corporations.