SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
from the It's-getting-awful-crowded-in-my-sky dept.
Arthur T Knackerbracket has found the following story:
For the better part of a year, SpaceX has gotten the lion's share of attention when it comes to mega-constellations and satellite Internet.
[...] But it was actually another company, OneWeb, that launched the first six satellites of its mega-constellation back in February, 2019. Initial tests of those satellites went well, the company said last summer. Now OneWeb is preparing for its second launch of 34 satellites on board a Soyuz rocket from Baikonur, Kazakhstan. The launch is scheduled for 4:42pm ET (21:42 UTC) on Thursday, February 6.
On the eve of Thursday's launch, Ars spoke with OneWeb Chief Executive Officer Adrián Steckel about the company's plans and how it will compete with half a dozen other firms looking at providing Internet from space.
[...] "Right now, we’re the largest buyer of launch in the world," Steckel said. "In the future, as we look to our next phase of deployment, we're willing to buy rocket launches from SpaceX, Blue Origin, or whoever."
OneWeb has taken a different approach than SpaceX in terms of how it plans to interact with customers on the ground. SpaceX has opted to offer direct-to-consumer services with the intention of selling user terminals to acquire satellite from space and essentially functioning as a new Internet provider. OneWeb plans to partner with existing telecommunications companies, Steckel said.
[...] It's a model the company believes makes sense because the right answer for getting regulatory approval and delivering service in the United States or the Philippines or Indonesia will vary, Steckel said. "We're going to be doing business with partners around the world," Steckel said. "Our style is not confrontational. We're using a different model. It's a big world."
OneWeb plans to offer its first customer demonstrations by the end of 2020 and provide full commercial global services in 2021.
(Score: 2) by FatPhil on Tuesday February 04 2020, @09:53PM (7 children)
Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
(Score: 2) by takyon on Wednesday February 05 2020, @12:04AM (2 children)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SpaceX_Starlink#Launches [wikipedia.org]
The problem for OneWeb is the relentless pace of SpaceX launching its own satellites using its own rockets. It will only get worse if SpaceX switches to Starship.
It's not a bubble, it's a brick wall.
[SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
(Score: 2) by FatPhil on Wednesday February 05 2020, @12:51AM (1 child)
Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
(Score: 2) by c0lo on Wednesday February 05 2020, @02:46AM
Not saying that's not a problem, but is not such a critical one.
The StarLink are in the low LEO scale of altitudes. Without altitude correction (as the fragments resulted from a collision are supposed to be), they'll end burning in the atmosphere in about 10 years or so.
Max altitude for SpaceX StarLink - 340 km [wikipedia.org]
Hubble telescope [wikipedia.org] - perigee altitude: 537.0km. Left alone, it won't last until 2040 [space.com].
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
(Score: 1, Interesting) by khallow on Wednesday February 05 2020, @12:13AM (3 children)
(Score: 2) by FatPhil on Wednesday February 05 2020, @12:53AM (2 children)
New bits, khallow, new bits please.
Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 05 2020, @02:48AM
He's out of bits. His last chunks start coming down, burning on reentry.
(Score: 3, Informative) by khallow on Wednesday February 05 2020, @04:08AM
Why do you ask? Just because you might know (and we still haven't established that you did know prior to the previous post!), doesn't mean everyone else reading this does. It's new, ok? Here's some more on that NEW history [thespacereview.com]:
(Score: 2) by RedGreen on Tuesday February 04 2020, @09:59PM (1 child)
Good luck with that. If I am going with an idea like this I want rid of the parasites that are already in my area providing the service, not give them even more of my money again. So it will stand alone service I would be looking at.
"I modded down, down, down, and the flames went higher." -- Sven Olsen
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 05 2020, @02:52AM
But... but... 5G?! Not Huawei 5G, just pure and unadulterated American 5G! MAGA?!?
Can't do 5G from satellites, you know?
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 05 2020, @04:46PM
lol:
"Our style is not confrontational." so that's code for we will also offer our services where the "state" insists on controlling all forms of communication, because citizens are forbidden to point a antenna towards the sky and send and receive data (without paying their cut to the state trol... err... functionaries).
i suspect these states also sport a venn diagram where circles for "cannot point antenna at sky to receive data" and "point solid state device at sun and share electricity from it" are actually one and the same circle ...