Slash Boxes

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Thursday February 20 2020, @05:53PM   Printer-friendly
from the maybe-too-late dept.

Now Internet Society told to halt controversial .org sale... by its own advisory council: 'You misread the community mindset around dot-org':

The Internet Society's own members are now opposing its sale of the .org internet registry to an unknown private equity firm.

The Chapters Advisory Council, the official voice of Internet Society (ISOC) members, will vote this month on whether to approve a formal recommendation that the society "not proceed [with the sale] unless a number of conditions are met."

Those conditions largely comprise the publication of additional details and transparency regarding ISOC's controversial sell-off of .org. Despite months of requests, neither the society nor the proposed purchaser, Ethos Capital, have disclosed critical elements of the deal, including who would actually own the registry if the sale went through.

[...] ISOC – and .org's current operator, the ISOC-controlled Public Interest Registry (PIR) – are still hoping to push DNS overseer ICANN to make a decision on the .org sale before the end of the month. But that looks increasingly unlikely following an aggressive letter from ICANN's external lawyers last week insisting ICANN will take as much time as it feels necessary to review the deal.

The overall lack of transparency around the $1.13bn deal has led California's Attorney General to demand documents relating to the sale – and ISOC's chapters are demanding the same information as a pre-condition to any sale in their proposed advice to the ISOC board.

That information includes: full details of the transaction; a financial breakdown of what Ethos Capital intends to do with .org's 10 million internet addresses; binding commitments on limiting price increases and free speech protections; and publication of the bylaws and related corporate documents for both the replacement to the current registry operator, PIR, and the proposed "Stewardship Council" which Ethos claims will give .org users a say in future decisions.

[...] "There is a feeling amongst chapters that ISOC seems to have disregarded community participation, failed to properly account for the potential community impact, and misread the community mindset around the .ORG TLD," the Chapters Advisory Council's proposed advice to the ISOC board – a copy of which The Register has seen – states.

Although the advisory council has no legal ability to stop ISOC, if the proposed advice is approved by vote, and the CEO and board of trustees push ahead with the sale regardless, it could have severe repercussions for the organization's non-profit status, and would further undermine ISOC's position that the sale will "support the Internet Society's vision that the Internet is for everyone."

Original Submission

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Funny) by bzipitidoo on Thursday February 20 2020, @10:59PM

    by bzipitidoo (4388) on Thursday February 20 2020, @10:59PM (#960481) Journal

    Early in the 3rd millenium, cunning capitalists persuaded the public t part
    with the rights t a very p pular and useful letter, ' ', the 15th letter f
    the English alphabet and ne f just 5 rec gnized as v wels,
    in exchange f r a very large sum f m ney. The exact am unt is n l nger
    kn wn, but it is debatable wh g t the best f that deal.

    Hencef rth, n ne c uld use that letter with ut permissi n f the new
      wners. Any ne wh tried w uld receive a visit fr m law enf rcement,
    warning them that the 15th letter was n w pr perty f Ethos, wh thus far
    permitted the use f that letter nly f r the pr per spelling f their name.

    It was sune realized that the 15th letter was naht in fact necessary.
    Alternative saughnding spellings were quickly werked eaught.

    But then anuther prahblem areause. In a ceaurt case in which Ethos sued
    the entire werld, they asserted that they alseau eauwned the number zereau,
    as it used the same shape. Mathematicians were in the difficult peausitian
    uf having teau switch back teau Reauman numerals 4 their calculatians.
    The final straw heauwever was the prahblems this caused the stawk markets
    and banks.

    Histery duhse naht receaurd the eauutcumme uf the case, but unne uf
    the eauwners uf Ethos was faughnd dead at the base uf a very tall building.
    It had laughng been a custum 4 financiers whu laughst all their clients'
    muney teau threauw themselves frum the ledge uf a skyscraper. But in this
    case, it is thahght that the eauwner had summe assistance.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Offtopic=1, Funny=2, Total=3
    Extra 'Funny' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3